Literature DB >> 17067845

Are there really interactive processes in speech perception?

James M McQueen, Dennis Norris, Anne Cutler.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 17067845     DOI： 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN： 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

1.  Eye movements reveal fast, voice-specific priming.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01-04

2.  Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Dynamic speech representations in the human temporal lobe.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The phonemic restoration effect reveals pre-N400 effect of supportive sentence context in speech perception.

Authors:  David M Groppe; Marvin Choi; Tiffany Huang; Joseph Schilz; Ben Topkins; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Clustering coefficients of lexical neighborhoods: Does neighborhood structure matter in spoken word recognition?

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; Thomas Gruenenfelder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2010-11-01

6.  Integration of pragmatic and phonetic cues in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Hannah Rohde; Marc Ettlinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The Bilingual Language Interaction Network for Comprehension of Speech.

Authors:  Anthony Shook; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2013-04-01

8.  The lexical restructuring hypothesis and graph theoretic analyses of networks based on random lexicons.

Authors:  Thomas M Gruenenfelder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Temporal cortex reflects effects of sentence context on phonetic processing.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Caden Salvata; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Transformation of a temporal speech cue to a spatial neural code in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Neal P Fox; Matthew Leonard; Matthias J Sjerps; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 8.140
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.