Literature DB >> 33683449

Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise.

T M Vanessa Chan1,2, Bradley R Buchsbaum1,2, Claude Alain3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

Speech perception in noise is a cognitively demanding process that challenges not only the auditory sensory system, but also cognitive networks involved in attention. The predictive coding theory has been influential in characterizing the influence of prior context on processing incoming auditory stimuli, with comparatively less research dedicated to "postdictive" processes and subsequent context effects on speech perception. Effects of subsequent semantic context were evaluated while manipulating the relationship of three target words presented in noise and the temporal position of targets compared to the subsequent contextual cue, demonstrating that subsequent context benefits were present regardless of whether the targets were related to each other and did not depend on the position of the target. However, participants instructed to focus on the relation between target and cue performed worse than those who did not receive this instruction, suggesting a disruption of a natural process of continuous speech recognition. We discuss these findings in relation to lexical commitment and stimulus-driven attention to short-term memory as mechanisms of subsequent context integration.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33683449     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01494-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  36 in total

1.  Orienting attention to sound object representations attenuates change deafness.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

Review 3.  Attention to memory: orienting attention to sound object representations.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 4.  The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Neural dynamics underlying attentional orienting to auditory representations in short-term memory.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Malcolm A Binns; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Semantic versus perceptual interactions in neural processing of speech-in-noise.

Authors:  Narly Golestani; Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Jonas Obleser; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Stacey Samuels Cole
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Age-related differences in orienting attention to sound object representations.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Madeline Cusimano; Linda Garami; Kristina C Backer; Bettina Habelt; Vanessa Chan; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Does semantic context benefit speech understanding through "top-down" processes? Evidence from time-resolved sparse fMRI.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Michael A Ford; Ferath Kherif; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.