Literature DB >> 23231119

On the possibility of a place code for the low pitch of high-frequency complex tones.

Sébastien Santurette1, Torsten Dau, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Harmonics are considered unresolved when they interact with neighboring harmonics and cannot be heard out separately. Several studies have suggested that the pitch derived from unresolved harmonics is coded via temporal fine-structure cues emerging from their peripheral interactions. Such conclusions rely on the assumption that the components of complex tones with harmonic ranks down to at least 9 were indeed unresolved. The present study tested this assumption via three different measures: (1) the effects of relative component phase on pitch matches, (2) the effects of dichotic presentation on pitch matches, and (3) listeners' ability to hear out the individual components. No effects of relative component phase or dichotic presentation on pitch matches were found in the tested conditions. Large individual differences were found in listeners' ability to hear out individual components. Overall, the results are consistent with the coding of individual harmonic frequencies, based on the tonotopic activity pattern or phase locking to individual harmonics, rather than with temporal coding of single-channel interactions. However, they are also consistent with more general temporal theories of pitch involving the across-channel summation of information from resolved and/or unresolved harmonics. Simulations of auditory-nerve responses to the stimuli suggest potential benefits to a spatiotemporal mechanism.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23231119      PMCID: PMC3528728          DOI: 10.1121/1.4764897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  45 in total

1.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression.

Authors:  X Zhang; M G Heinz; I C Bruce; L H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluating auditory performance limits: i. one-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Perception of the low pitch of frequency-shifted complexes.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Moore; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

5.  Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Joshua G W Bernstein; Hector Penagos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?

Authors:  Joshua G Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  J E Rose; J F Brugge; D J Anderson; J E Hind
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Period histogram and product spectrum: new methods for fundamental-frequency measurement.

Authors:  M R Schroeder
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pitch perception of two-frequency stimuli.

Authors:  G F Smoorenburg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; David A Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30

2.  High-resolution frequency tuning but not temporal coding in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Christian Desloovere; Philip X Joris
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Re-examining the upper limit of temporal pitch.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.