Literature DB >> 3722006

Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears.

R Probst, A C Coats, G K Martin, B L Lonsbury-Martin.   

Abstract

Evoked and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions were recorded bilaterally in a group of normal subjects (n = 14) using clicks and tonebursts at four frequencies (0.5, 1, 1.5, and 3 kHz). All ears (n = 28) demonstrated evoked emissions, but not to every stimulus type. The 0.5-kHz toneburst evoked emissions in only 10 (36%) ears, the 1.5-kHz toneburst in all ears, and the remaining stimuli in at least 80% of ears. Two distinct patterns of evoked emissions were identified. Five (18%) ears showed short, broadband click-evoked emissions lasting less than 20 ms after stimulus onset. In these ears, toneburst-evoked emissions were often more prominent than click-evoked emissions and no spontaneous emissions were detected. Twenty-three (82%) ears showed click-evoked emissions lasting longer than 20 ms poststimulus onset. Spectral analysis of these emissions demonstrated several (2-10) narrow frequency peaks. Highly similar peaks were present in the spectra of toneburst-evoked emissions within the range of toneburst spectra. Spontaneous emissions were recorded in 12 of the 23 ears. In these ears, at the frequencies of spontaneous emissions, prominent peaks in both click- and toneburst-evoked emission spectra were always present. Otoacoustic emission characteristics correlated significantly between the ears of individual subjects inferring that a symmetrical cochlear mechanism generates otoacoustic emissions.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3722006     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90224-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  The properties of spontaneous and evoked acoustic emissions in neonates and children: a preliminary report.

Authors:  P Bonfils; A Uziel; P Narcy
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1989

2.  Nonlinear time-domain cochlear model for transient stimulation and human otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Torsten Dau; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A correlative study of evoked otoacoustic emission properties and audiometric thresholds.

Authors:  P Bonfils; J P Piron; A Uziel; R Pujol
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1988

4.  A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Otoacoustic emissions: a new method to diagnose hearing impairment in children.

Authors:  P G Zorowka
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing ears and in ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  R Hauser; R Probst; E Löhle
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Auditory perception bias in speech imitation.

Authors:  Marie Postma-Nilsenová; Eric Postma
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-05

8.  Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in TectaY1870C/+ Mice Reflect Changes in Cochlear Amplification and How It Is Controlled by the Tectorial Membrane.

Authors:  Mary Ann Cheatham; Yingjie Zhou; Richard J Goodyear; Peter Dallos; Guy P Richardson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-12-26

9.  Tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates: normative data.

Authors:  Vicky Wei Zhang; Bradley McPherson; Zhi-Guo Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2008-04-17

10.  Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Krzysztof Kochanek; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.