Literature DB >> 28159652

Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.

Golbarg Mehraei1, Andreu Paredes Gallardo2, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham3, Torsten Dau2.   

Abstract

In rodent models, acoustic exposure too modest to elevate hearing thresholds can nonetheless cause auditory nerve fiber deafferentation, interfering with the coding of supra-threshold sound. Low-spontaneous rate nerve fibers, important for encoding acoustic information at supra-threshold levels and in noise, are more susceptible to degeneration than high-spontaneous rate fibers. The change in auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave-V latency with noise level has been shown to be associated with auditory nerve deafferentation. Here, we measured ABR in a forward masking paradigm and evaluated wave-V latency changes with increasing masker-to-probe intervals. In the same listeners, behavioral forward masking detection thresholds were measured. We hypothesized that 1) auditory nerve fiber deafferentation increases forward masking thresholds and increases wave-V latency and 2) a preferential loss of low-spontaneous rate fibers results in a faster recovery of wave-V latency as the slow contribution of these fibers is reduced. Results showed that in young audiometrically normal listeners, a larger change in wave-V latency with increasing masker-to-probe interval was related to a greater effect of a preceding masker behaviorally. Further, the amount of wave-V latency change with masker-to-probe interval was positively correlated with the rate of change in forward masking detection thresholds. Although we cannot rule out central contributions, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that auditory nerve fiber deafferentation occurs in humans and may predict how well individuals can hear in noisy environments.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory brainstem response; Cochlear synaptopathy; Forward masking; Hidden hearing loss

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28159652      PMCID: PMC5402043          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  68 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.

Authors:  T Dau; O Wegner; V Mellert; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers. II. Dependence on spontaneous activity and relation to cochlear nonlinearity.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Nola C Rich; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Influence of centrifugal pathways on forward masking of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons.

Authors:  S E Shore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.

Authors:  Søren Jørgensen; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Nonlinear time-domain cochlear model for transient stimulation and human otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Torsten Dau; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Contribution of auditory nerve fibers to compound action potential of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Jérôme Bourien; Yong Tang; Charlène Batrel; Antoine Huet; Marc Lenoir; Sabine Ladrech; Gilles Desmadryl; Régis Nouvian; Jean-Luc Puel; Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. III. Anatomic locus.

Authors:  R Burkard; K E Hecox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Chronux: a platform for analyzing neural signals.

Authors:  Hemant Bokil; Peter Andrews; Jayant E Kulkarni; Samar Mehta; Partha P Mitra
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  11 in total

1.  Auditory Processing Deficits Are Selectively Associated with Medial Temporal Lobe Mnemonic Function and White Matter Integrity in Aging Macaques.

Authors:  Daniel T Gray; Lavanya Umapathy; Nicole M De La Peña; Sara N Burke; James R Engle; Theodore P Trouard; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Auditory and Visual System White Matter Is Differentially Impacted by Normative Aging in Macaques.

Authors:  Daniel T Gray; Nicole M De La Peña; Lavanya Umapathy; Sara N Burke; James R Engle; Theodore P Trouard; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Auditory Measures for Detecting Hidden Hearing Loss and/or Cochlear Synaptopathy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christi M Barbee; Jessica A James; Jin Hyung Park; Emily M Smith; Carole E Johnson; Shari Clifton; Jeffrey L Danhauer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-06-15

5.  Noise Masking in Cochlear Synaptopathy: Auditory Brainstem Response vs. Auditory Nerve Response in Mouse.

Authors:  Kirupa Suthakar; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.974

6.  Optimizing non-invasive functional markers for cochlear deafferentation based on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 7.  Subcortical pathways: Towards a better understanding of auditory disorders.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Boris Gourévitch; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Reliability of Measures of N1 Peak Amplitude of the Compound Action Potential in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Judy R Dubno; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Hidden Hearing Loss? No Effect of Common Recreational Noise Exposure on Cochlear Nerve Response Amplitude in Humans.

Authors:  Sarah K Grinn; Kathryn B Wiseman; Jason A Baker; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Adaptation and spectral enhancement at auditory temporal perceptual boundaries - Measurements via temporal precision of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Diana B Geissler; Elke Weiler; Günter Ehret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.