Literature DB >> 23197296

RNF4 is required for DNA double-strand break repair in vivo.

R Vyas1, R Kumar, F Clermont, A Helfricht, P Kalev, P Sotiropoulou, I A Hendriks, E Radaelli, T Hochepied, C Blanpain, A Sablina, H van Attikum, J V Olsen, A G Jochemsen, A C O Vertegaal, J-C Marine.   

Abstract

Unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) cause genetic instability that leads to malignant transformation or cell death. Cells respond to DSBs with the ordered recruitment of signaling and repair proteins to the sites of DNA lesions. Coordinated protein SUMOylation and ubiquitylation have crucial roles in regulating the dynamic assembly of protein complexes at these sites. However, how SUMOylation influences protein ubiquitylation at DSBs is poorly understood. We show herein that Rnf4, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets SUMO-modified proteins, accumulates in DSB repair foci and is required for both homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining repair. To establish a link between Rnf4 and the DNA damage response (DDR) in vivo, we generated an Rnf4 allelic series in mice. We show that Rnf4-deficiency causes persistent ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage and signaling, and that Rnf4-deficient cells and mice exhibit increased sensitivity to genotoxic stress. Mechanistically, we show that Rnf4 targets SUMOylated MDC1 and SUMOylated BRCA1, and is required for the loading of Rad51, an enzyme required for HR repair, onto sites of DNA damage. Similarly to inactivating mutations in other key regulators of HR repair, Rnf4 deficiency leads to age-dependent impairment in spermatogenesis. These findings identify Rnf4 as a critical component of the DDR in vivo and support the possibility that Rnf4 controls protein localization at DNA damage sites by integrating SUMOylation and ubiquitylation events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23197296      PMCID: PMC3569989          DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2012.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Death Differ        ISSN: 1350-9047            Impact factor:   15.828


  44 in total

1.  Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  A J Pierce; P Hu; M Han; N Ellis; M Jasin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX.

Authors:  Arkady Celeste; Simone Petersen; Peter J Romanienko; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Hua Tang Chen; Olga A Sedelnikova; Bernardo Reina-San-Martin; Vincenzo Coppola; Eric Meffre; Michael J Difilippantonio; Christophe Redon; Duane R Pilch; Alexandru Olaru; Michael Eckhaus; R Daniel Camerini-Otero; Lino Tessarollo; Ferenc Livak; Katia Manova; William M Bonner; Michel C Nussenzweig; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Ines Krüger; Larry H Thompson; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Manuel Stucki; Julie A Clapperton; Duaa Mohammad; Michael B Yaffe; Stephen J Smerdon; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; D R Pilch; A H Orr; V S Ivanova; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-03-06       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  DNA double-strand breaks associated with replication forks are predominantly repaired by homologous recombination involving an exchange mechanism in mammalian cells.

Authors:  C Arnaudeau; C Lundin; T Helleday
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Intra-nuclear trafficking of the BLM helicase to DNA damage-induced foci is regulated by SUMO modification.

Authors:  Sonia Eladad; Tian-Zhang Ye; Peng Hu; Margaret Leversha; Sergey Beresten; Michael J Matunis; Nathan A Ellis
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Distinct spatiotemporal dynamics of mammalian checkpoint regulators induced by DNA damage.

Authors:  Claudia Lukas; Jacob Falck; Jirina Bartkova; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  p53 Binding protein 53BP1 is required for DNA damage responses and tumor suppression in mice.

Authors:  Irene M Ward; Kay Minn; Jan van Deursen; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Efficient gene modulation in mouse epiblast using a Sox2Cre transgenic mouse strain.

Authors:  Shigemi Hayashi; Paula Lewis; Larysa Pevny; Andrew P McMahon
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.882

View more
  59 in total

1.  MEIOTIC F-BOX Is Essential for Male Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Rice.

Authors:  Yi He; Chong Wang; James D Higgins; Junping Yu; Jie Zong; Pingli Lu; Dabing Zhang; Wanqi Liang
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  SUMO rules: regulatory concepts and their implication in neurologic functions.

Authors:  Mathias Droescher; Viduth K Chaugule; Andrea Pichler
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 3.  Push back to respond better: regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response.

Authors:  Stephanie Panier; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  RPA-coated single-stranded DNA as a platform for post-translational modifications in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Alexandre Maréchal; Lee Zou
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 5.  Two-way communications between ubiquitin-like modifiers and DNA.

Authors:  Helle D Ulrich
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  RNF4 interacts with both SUMO and nucleosomes to promote the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Lynda M Groocock; Minghua Nie; John Prudden; Davide Moiani; Tao Wang; Anton Cheltsov; Robert P Rambo; Andrew S Arvai; Chiharu Hitomi; John A Tainer; Karolin Luger; J Jefferson P Perry; Eros Lazzerini-Denchi; Michael N Boddy
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  A comprehensive compilation of SUMO proteomics.

Authors:  Ivo A Hendriks; Alfred C O Vertegaal
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 8.  Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus.

Authors:  Stephanie Panier; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 9.  DNA damage and tissue repair: What we can learn from planaria.

Authors:  Paul G Barghouth; Manish Thiruvalluvan; Melanie LeGro; Néstor J Oviedo
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 7.727

10.  Slx5/Slx8 Promotes Replication Stress Tolerance by Facilitating Mitotic Progression.

Authors:  Yee Mon Thu; Susan Kaye Van Riper; LeeAnn Higgins; Tianji Zhang; Jordan Robert Becker; Todd William Markowski; Hai Dang Nguyen; Timothy Jon Griffin; Anja Katrin Bielinsky
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.