Literature DB >> 24002223

Push back to respond better: regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response.

Stephanie Panier1, Daniel Durocher.   

Abstract

Single DNA lesions such as DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can cause cell death or trigger genome rearrangements that have oncogenic potential, and so the pathways that mend and signal DNA damage must be highly sensitive but, at the same time, selective and reversible. When initiated, boundaries must be set to restrict the DSB response to the site of the lesion. The integration of positive and, crucially, negative control points involving post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and acetylation is key for building fast, effective responses to DNA damage and for mitigating the impact of DNA lesions on genome integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24002223     DOI: 10.1038/nrm3659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 1471-0072            Impact factor:   94.444


  119 in total

1.  How shelterin solves the telomere end-protection problem.

Authors:  T de Lange
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2011-01-05

2.  A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Michael-Christopher Keogh; Jung-Ae Kim; Michael Downey; Jeffrey Fillingham; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Jacob C Harrison; Megumi Onishi; Nira Datta; Sarah Galicia; Andrew Emili; Judy Lieberman; Xuetong Shen; Stephen Buratowski; James E Haber; Daniel Durocher; Jack F Greenblatt; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Manuel Stucki; Julie A Clapperton; Duaa Mohammad; Michael B Yaffe; Stephen J Smerdon; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Tandem protein interaction modules organize the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Stephanie Panier; Yosuke Ichijima; Amélie Fradet-Turcotte; Charles C Y Leung; Lilia Kaustov; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Inactivation of murine Usp1 results in genomic instability and a Fanconi anemia phenotype.

Authors:  Jung Min Kim; Kalindi Parmar; Min Huang; David M Weinstock; Carrie Ann Ruit; Jeffrey L Kutok; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.

Authors:  Simona Giunta; Rimma Belotserkovskaya; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 7.  Design principles of regulatory networks: searching for the molecular algorithms of the cell.

Authors:  Wendell A Lim; Connie M Lee; Chao Tang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Viral E3 ubiquitin ligase-mediated degradation of a cellular E3: viral mimicry of a cellular phosphorylation mark targets the RNF8 FHA domain.

Authors:  Mira S Chaurushiya; Caroline E Lilley; Aaron Aslanian; Jill Meisenhelder; Daniel C Scott; Sébastien Landry; Simina Ticau; Chris Boutell; John R Yates; Brenda A Schulman; Tony Hunter; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  RAD18 transmits DNA damage signalling to elicit homologous recombination repair.

Authors:  Jun Huang; Michael S Y Huen; Hongtae Kim; Charles Chung Yun Leung; J N Mark Glover; Xiaochun Yu; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  WSTF regulates the H2A.X DNA damage response via a novel tyrosine kinase activity.

Authors:  Andrew Xiao; Haitao Li; David Shechter; Sung Hee Ahn; Laura A Fabrizio; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Satoko Ishibe-Murakami; Bin Wang; Paul Tempst; Kay Hofmann; Dinshaw J Patel; Stephen J Elledge; C David Allis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  87 in total

Review 1.  The DNA damage-induced cell death response: a roadmap to kill cancer cells.

Authors:  Sonja Matt; Thomas G Hofmann
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  DNA repair pathways and their roles in drug resistance for lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Altan Kara; Aykut Özgür; Sinem Nalbantoğlu; Abdullah Karadağ
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  Non-histone protein methylation as a regulator of cellular signalling and function.

Authors:  Kyle K Biggar; Shawn S-C Li
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  Control of gene editing by manipulation of DNA repair mechanisms.

Authors:  Eric Danner; Sanum Bashir; Saniye Yumlu; Wolfgang Wurst; Benedikt Wefers; Ralf Kühn
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  CtIP/Ctp1/Sae2, molecular form fit for function.

Authors:  Sara N Andres; R Scott Williams
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 6.  When genome integrity and cell cycle decisions collide: roles of polo kinases in cellular adaptation to DNA damage.

Authors:  Diego Serrano; Damien D'Amours
Journal:  Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2014-07-27

Review 7.  Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus.

Authors:  Stephanie Panier; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  Taxane-mediated radiosensitization derives from chromosomal missegregation on tripolar mitotic spindles orchestrated by AURKA and TPX2.

Authors:  M Orth; K Unger; U Schoetz; C Belka; K Lauber
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Nicotinamide Suppresses the DNA Damage Sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Independently of Sirtuin Deacetylases.

Authors:  Anthony Rössl; Amanda Bentley-DeSousa; Yi-Chieh Tseng; Christine Nwosu; Michael Downey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The transcription factor Cux1 in cerebellar granule cell development and medulloblastoma pathogenesis.

Authors:  Sabine Topka; Alexander Glassmann; Gunnar Weisheit; Ulrich Schüller; Karl Schilling
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.