Literature DB >> 23194821

Frequency of high-quality communication behaviors used by primary care providers of heterozygous infants after newborn screening.

Michael H Farrell1, Stephanie A Christopher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the quality of communication likely to be experienced by parents when being first informed about how newborn screening identified heterozygous "carrier" status for cystic fibrosis or sickle cell disease.
METHODS: Primary care providers (PCPs) of infants found to have carrier status were telephoned over a 48-month period, and asked to rehearse with a standardized patient how they would inform the infants' parent(s). 214 rehearsal transcripts were abstracted using explicit criteria methods to measure the frequency of five categories of high-quality communication behaviors.
RESULTS: Overall, PCPs used large amounts of jargon and failed to use high quality communication behaviors. On average, PCPs used 18.6 total jargon words (8.7 unique words), but explained 2.4 jargon words. The most frequent assessment of understanding was the close-ended version, although it was only seen in 129 of 214 transcripts. The most common organizing behavior was importance emphasis (121/214). Precautionary empathy was rare; the most frequent behavior was "instruction about emotion" (33/214).
CONCLUSION: The limited use of high-quality communication behaviors in rehearsals raises concern about parental understanding, decision-making, and psychosocial outcomes after newborn screening. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Measurement of specific behaviors may help PCPs to improve communication, and thereby improve the patient experience.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23194821      PMCID: PMC3566874          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  52 in total

1.  Improving communication between doctors and parents after newborn screening.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Stephanie A Christopher; Audrey Tluczek; Karen Kennedy-Parker; Alison La Pean; Kerry Eskra; Jenelle Collins; Gary Hoffman; Julie Panepinto; Philip M Farrell
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2011-10

2.  Child health providers' precautionary discussion of emotions during communication about results of newborn genetic screening.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Jodi Speiser; Lindsay Deuster; Stephanie Christopher
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-01

3.  Initially misleading communication of carrier results after newborn genetic screening.

Authors:  Alison La Pean; Michael H Farrell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Pediatric residents' use of jargon during counseling about newborn genetic screening results.

Authors:  Michael Farrell; Lindsay Deuster; Jodi Donovan; Stephanie Christopher
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Genetic screening.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Beth Tarini; Nancy A Press; James P Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Psychosocial consequences of false-positive newborn screens for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Kate Murphy Orland; Laura Cavanagh
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-09-17

7.  A structured implicit abstraction method to evaluate whether content of counseling before prostate cancer screening is consistent with recommendations by experts.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Evelyn C Y Chan; Lynnea K Ladouceur; Jeffrey M Stein
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-10-17

8.  Communication of carrier status information following universal newborn screening for sickle cell disorders and cystic fibrosis: qualitative study of experience and practice.

Authors:  J Kai; F Ulph; T Cullinan; N Qureshi
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  A method to quantify and compare clinicians' assessments of patient understanding during counseling of standardized patients.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Pramita Kuruvilla; Kerry L Eskra; Stephanie A Christopher; Rebecca S Brienza
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-04-19

10.  A qualitative secondary evaluation of statewide follow-up interviews for abnormal newborn screening results for cystic fibrosis and sickle cell hemoglobinopathy.

Authors:  Alison La Pean; Jenelle L Collins; Stephanie A Christopher; Kerry L Eskra; Sara J Roedl; Audrey Tluczek; Michael H Farrell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  10 in total

1.  Emotional Communication in HIV Care: An Observational Study of Patients' Expressed Emotions and Clinician Response.

Authors:  Jenny Park; Somnath Saha; Dingfen Han; Stéphanie De Maesschalck; Richard Moore; Todd Korthuis; Debra Roter; Amy Knowlton; Tanita Woodson; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2019-10

2.  Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Sarah Patton; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann; June C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Understanding Effective Delivery of Patient and Family Education in Pediatric OncologyA Systematic Review From the Children's Oncology Group [Formula: see text].

Authors:  Cheryl C Rodgers; Catherine M Laing; Ruth Anne Herring; Nancy Tena; Adrianne Leonardelli; Marilyn Hockenberry; Verna Hendricks-Ferguson
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Disparities in current and future childhood and newborn carrier identification.

Authors:  Melissa Noke; Alison Wearden; Sarah Peters; Fiona Ulph
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Primary care providers' experiences notifying parents of cystic fibrosis newborn screening results.

Authors:  Caitlin Finan; Samya Z Nasr; Erin Rothwell; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  Improving the quality of physician communication with rapid-throughput analysis and report cards.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Stephanie A Christopher; Alison La Pean Kirschner; Sara J Roedl; Faith O O'Tool; Nadia Y Ahmad; Philip M Farrell
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-08-28

7.  Benefit of Report Card Feedback After Point-of-Care Assessment of Communication Quality Indicators.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Clair R Sprenger; Shelbie L Sullivan; Bree A Trisler; Jessica J F Kram; Erin K Ruppel
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2017-01-31

8.  Assessment of parent understanding in conferences for critically ill neonates.

Authors:  Mary C Barks; Emma A Schindler; Peter A Ubel; Megan G Jiao; Kathryn I Pollak; Hanna E Huffstetler; Monica E Lemmon
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-06-11

9.  Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Kathryn I Pollak; Catherine Rehder; Adam H Buchanan; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer H Crow; Michael Datto
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Genetic Counselors' Experience with and Opinions on the Management of Newborn Screening Incidental Carrier Findings.

Authors:  Kristen Leppert; Katharine Bisordi; Jessica Nieto; Kristin Maloney; Yue Guan; Shannan Dixon; Alena Egense
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.537

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.