Literature DB >> 25009079

Disparities in current and future childhood and newborn carrier identification.

Melissa Noke1, Alison Wearden, Sarah Peters, Fiona Ulph.   

Abstract

International carrier testing guidelines discourage testing in childhood to preserve autonomous decision making and prevent detrimental psychosocial consequences. Despite the discouragement of autosomal recessive carrier testing during childhood, some sickle cell disease (SCD) or cystic fibrosis (CF) carriers are incidentally identified through UK and international newborn screening (NBS). This creates a scenario where parents may have knowledge of their newborn's, but not older child's carrier status. In addition, there is wide variation in the identification of CF and SCD carriers due to the screening technologies implemented by different NBS programs. The current and future availability of childhood testing are determined to some extent by the impact of testing on children and parents (whether this is beneficial or detrimental to wellbeing). However empirical research informing carrier guidance and practice is conflicting. Echoing previous calls, this discussion highlights the need for further qualitative and longitudinal research with children to consider the psychosocial impact of carrier testing on children and role of disclosure from parents on adaptation to results. It is recommended that professionals aim to minimize harms resulting from carrier identification by providing support for parents and children following NBS. Support for non-genetics specialists from genetic counselors to enable discussion of carrier results with children is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25009079     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9740-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  31 in total

1.  Health-care providers' views on pursuing reproductive benefit through newborn screening: the case of sickle cell disorders.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Brenda J Wilson; June C Carroll; Martha Paynter; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Newborn screening for sickle cell disease: whose reproductive benefit?

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Newborn screening and carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: alternative or complementary?

Authors:  Carlo Castellani; John Massie
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 16.671

5.  Providing genetic risk information to parents of newborns with sickle cell trait: role of the general practitioner in neonatal screening.

Authors:  Fleur Vansenne; Corianne A J M de Borgie; Monica Legdeur; Marjo Oey Spauwen; Marjolein Peters
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-05-16

6.  The genetic testing of children. Working Party of the Clinical Genetics Society (UK)

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 7.  Disclosing to parents newborn carrier status identified by routine blood spot screening.

Authors:  S Oliver; C Dezateux; J Kavanagh; T Lempert; R Stewart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

8.  Use of social support during communication about sickle cell carrier status.

Authors:  Lisa Bradford; Sara J Roedl; Stephanie A Christopher; Michael H Farrell
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-05-31

9.  Positive screening and carrier results for the England-wide universal newborn sickle cell screening programme by ethnicity and area for 2005-07.

Authors:  Allison Streetly; Radoslav Latinovic; Joan Henthorn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Laine Friedman Ross; Howard M Saal; Karen L David; Rebecca R Anderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Sarah J Patton; June C Carroll; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann; Robin Z Hayeems
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Genetic Counselors' Experience with and Opinions on the Management of Newborn Screening Incidental Carrier Findings.

Authors:  Kristen Leppert; Katharine Bisordi; Jessica Nieto; Kristin Maloney; Yue Guan; Shannan Dixon; Alena Egense
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Health services use by children identified as heterozygous hemoglobinopathy mutation carriers via newborn screening.

Authors:  Sara D Khangura; Beth K Potter; Christine Davies; Robin Ducharme; A Brianne Bota; Steven Hawken; Kumanan Wilson; Maria D Karaceper; Robert J Klaassen; Julian Little; Ewurabena Simpson; Pranesh Chakraborty
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.125

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.