Literature DB >> 34127469

Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis.

Robin Z Hayeems1, Fiona A Miller2, Carolyn J Barg3, Yvonne Bombard4, Pranesh Chakraborty5, Beth K Potter6, Sarah Patton7, Jessica Peace Bytautas8, Karen Tam9, Louise Taylor10, Elizabeth Kerr11, Christine Davies12, Jennifer Milburn13, Felix Ratjen14, Astrid Guttmann15, June C Carroll16.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore primary care providers' (PCPs') role in result notification for newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF), given that expanded NBS has increased the number of positive screening test results, drawing attention to the role of PCPs in supporting families.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey and qualitative interviews.
SETTING: Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care providers (FPs, pediatricians, and midwives) who received a positive CF NBS result for an infant in their practice in the 6 months before the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether the PCP notified the family of the initial positive CF screening result.
RESULTS: Data from 321 PCP surveys (response rate of 51%) are reported, including 208 FPs, 68 pediatricians, and 45 midwives. Interviews were completed with 34 PCPs. Most (65%) surveyed PCPs reported notifying the infant's family of the initial positive screening result; 81% agreed that they have an important role to play in NBS; and 88% said it was important for PCPs, rather than the NBS centre, to notify families of initial positive results. With support and information from NBS centres, 68% would be extremely or very confident in doing so; this dropped to 54% when reflecting on their recent reporting experience. More than half (58%) of all PCPs said written point-of-care information from the NBS centre was the most helpful format. Adjusted for relevant factors, written educational information was associated with a lower rate of notifying families than written plus verbal information (risk ratio of 0.79; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.92). In the interviews, PCPs emphasized the challenge of balancing required content knowledge with the desire for the news to come from a familiar provider.
CONCLUSION: Most PCPs notify families of NBS results and value this role. These data are relevant as NBS programs and other genomic services expand and consider ways of keeping PCPs confident and actively involved.
Copyright © the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34127469      PMCID: PMC8202749          DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6706439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  29 in total

1.  Newborn blood spot screening and genetic services: a survey of Minnesota primary care physicians.

Authors:  Diane B Thompson; Mary J Ahrens; Bonnie S LeRoy; Dana Brown; Susan A Berry
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Responding to rising cancer caseloads: family physician learning needs and challenges in cancer care.

Authors:  Joan Sargeant; Anne Murray; Jean Gray; Suzanne Ferrier; Dorothy Barnard; Andrew Padmos; Elaine Loney
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Primary care role in expanded newborn screening: After the heel prick test.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; June C Carroll; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty; Brenda J Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Primary care providers' experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Tutsirai Makuwaza; Donna P Manca; Nicolette Sopcak; Joanne A Permaul; Mary Ann O'Brien; Ruth Heisey; Elizabeth A Eisenhauer; Julie Easley; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Baukje Miedema; Sandhya Pruthi; Carol Sawka; Nancy Schneider; Jonathan Sussman; Robin Urquhart; Catarina Versaevel; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Parents' knowledge of neonatal screening and response to false-positive cystic fibrosis testing.

Authors:  A Tluczek; E H Mischler; P M Farrell; N Fost; N M Peterson; P Carey; W T Bruns; C McCarthy
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.225

6.  False-Positive Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis and Health Care Use.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Marian Vermeulen; Beth K Potter; Pranesh Chakraborty; Christine Davies; June C Carroll; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Frequency of high-quality communication behaviors used by primary care providers of heterozygous infants after newborn screening.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Stephanie A Christopher
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-11-26

8.  "I think we've got too many tests!": Prenatal providers' reflections on ethical and clinical challenges in the practice integration of cell-free DNA screening.

Authors:  B L Gammon; S A Kraft; M Michie; M Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  Genomic sequencing in cystic fibrosis newborn screening: what works best, two-tier predefined CFTR mutation panels or second-tier CFTR panel followed by third-tier sequencing?

Authors:  Robert J Currier; Stan Sciortino; Ruiling Liu; Tracey Bishop; Rasoul Alikhani Koupaei; Lisa Feuchtbaum
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Primary-care providers' perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Natalie A Mikat-Stevens; Ingrid A Larson; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.