Literature DB >> 21709145

Genetic screening.

Wylie Burke1, Beth Tarini, Nancy A Press, James P Evans.   

Abstract

Current approaches to genetic screening include newborn screening to identify infants who would benefit from early treatment, reproductive genetic screening to assist reproductive decision making, and family history assessment to identify individuals who would benefit from additional prevention measures. Although the traditional goal of screening is to identify early disease or risk in order to implement preventive therapy, genetic screening has always included an atypical element-information relevant to reproductive decisions. New technologies offer increasingly comprehensive identification of genetic conditions and susceptibilities. Tests based on these technologies are generating a different approach to screening that seeks to inform individuals about all of their genetic traits and susceptibilities for purposes that incorporate rapid diagnosis, family planning, and expediting of research, as well as the traditional screening goal of improving prevention. Use of these tests in population screening will increase the challenges already encountered in genetic screening programs, including false-positive and ambiguous test results, overdiagnosis, and incidental findings. Whether this approach is desirable requires further empiric research, but it also requires careful deliberation on the part of all concerned, including genomic researchers, clinicians, public health officials, health care payers, and especially those who will be the recipients of this novel screening approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21709145      PMCID: PMC3166195          DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxr008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Rev        ISSN: 0193-936X            Impact factor:   6.222


  114 in total

Review 1.  Population screening in the age of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Linda L McCabe; Edward R B McCabe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Effect of a phenylalanine-restricted diet on patients with phenylketonuria; clinical observations in three cases.

Authors:  F A HORNER; C W STREAMER
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1956-08-25

3.  Preparing for a consumer-driven genomic age.

Authors:  James P Evans; David C Dale; Cathy Fomous
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting.

Authors:  Idit Maya; Bella Davidov; Liron Gershovitz; Yael Zalzstein; Ellen Taub; Justine Coppinger; Lisa G Shaffer; Mordechai Shohat
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  State newborn screening in the tandem mass spectrometry era: more tests, more false-positive results.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Dimitri A Christakis; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 78: hemoglobinopathies in pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: hereditary colorectal cancer and genetic testing.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Neonatal screening for sickle cell disorders: what about the carrier infants?

Authors:  L Laird; C Dezateux; E N Anionwu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-17

9.  Phenylketonuria in adulthood: a collaborative study.

Authors:  R Koch; B Burton; G Hoganson; R Peterson; W Rhead; B Rouse; R Scott; J Wolff; A M Stern; F Guttler; M Nelson; F de la Cruz; J Coldwell; R Erbe; M T Geraghty; C Shear; J Thomas; C Azen
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.982

10.  Birth prevalence of Down syndrome in Singapore from 1993 to 1998.

Authors:  F M Lai; B H Woo; K H Tan; J Huang; S T Lee; T B Yan; B H Tan; S K Chew; G S H Yeo
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.858

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Christenhusz; Koenraad Devriendt; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  A population approach to precision medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Marta L Gwinn; Russell E Glasgow; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Prenatal whole genome sequencing: just because we can, should we?

Authors:  Greer Donley; Sara Chandros Hull; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Galen Joseph; Flavia Chen; Julie Harris-Wai; Jennifer M Puck; Charlotte Young; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Comparison of Informed Consent Preferences for Multiplex Genetic Carrier Screening among a Diverse Population.

Authors:  Ashley Reeves; Angela Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Diversity and inclusion in genomic research: why the uneven progress?

Authors:  Amy R Bentley; Shawneequa Callier; Charles N Rotimi
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-07-18

7.  Applying Genomic Analysis to Newborn Screening.

Authors:  B D Solomon; D E Pineda-Alvarez; K A Bear; J C Mullikin; J P Evans
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2012-07-25

8.  Personalised medicine, disease prevention, and the inverse care law: more harm than benefit?

Authors:  Jack E James
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 9.  The measurement of patient attitudes regarding prenatal and preconception genetic carrier screening and translational behavioral medicine: an integrative review.

Authors:  Jennifer J Shiroff; Mathew J Gregoski
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Eric Vermeulen; Carla G van El; Liesbeth Claassen; Danielle R M Timmermans; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.