Literature DB >> 23189294

Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.

Azin Parsa1, Norliza Ibrahim, Bassam Hassan, Alessandro Motroni, Paul van der Stelt, Daniel Wismeijer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) voxel gray value measurements using Hounsfield units (HU) derived from multislice computed tomography (MSCT) as a clinical reference (gold standard).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten partially edentulous human mandibular cadavers were scanned by two types of computed tomography (CT) modalities: multislice CT and cone beam CT. On MSCT scans, eight regions of interest (ROI) designating the site for preoperative implant placement were selected in each mandible. The datasets from both CT systems were matched using a three-dimensional (3D) registration algorithm. The mean voxel gray values of the region around the implant sites were compared between MSCT and CBCT.
RESULTS: Significant differences between the mean gray values obtained by CBCT and HU by MSCT were found. In all the selected ROIs, CBCT showed higher mean values than MSCT. A strong correlation (R=0.968) between mean voxel gray values of CBCT and mean HU of MSCT was determined.
CONCLUSIONS: Voxel gray values from CBCT deviate from actual HU units. However, a strong linear correlation exists, which may permit deriving actual HU units from CBCT using linear regression models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23189294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  24 in total

Review 1.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Guldane Magat; Sevgi Ozcan Sener
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Assessment of metal artefact reduction around dental titanium implants in cone beam CT.

Authors:  A Parsa; N Ibrahim; B Hassan; K Syriopoulos; P van der Stelt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Alveolar Bone Density Between Subjects with and without Aggressive Periodontitis.

Authors:  Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Eman Y Elfirt; Manea M Al-Ahmari; Ibrahim A Yamany; Maher A Alabdulkarim; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

5.  Can gray values derived from CT and cone beam CT estimate new bone formation? An in vivo study.

Authors:  Farshid Bastami; Shahriar Shahab; Azin Parsa; Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas; Mohammad Hadi Noori Kooshki; Mahshid Namdari; Hamidreza Azimi Lisar; Tohid Rafiei; Farahnaz Fahimipour; Majid Salehi; Maissa Jafari
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-31

6.  Assessment of CT numbers in limited and medium field-of-view scans taken using Accuitomo 170 and Veraviewepocs 3De cone-beam computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Matheus L Oliveira; Guilherme M Tosoni; David H Lindsey; Kristopher Mendoza; Sotirios Tetradis; Sanjay M Mallya
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-11-25

7.  Comparative assessment of 3D reconstruction technique and Cavalieri's principle in predicting the mandibular bone defect volumes.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Altay; Faisal A Quereshy; Sumit K Nijhawan; Jose F Teppa; Michael P Horan; Nelli Yıldırımyan; Dale A Baur
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2018-05-01

8.  Development of a model of soft tissue simulation using ballistic gelatin for CBCT acquisitions related to dentomaxillofacial radiology research.

Authors:  Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Priscila de Azeredo Lopes; Gustavo Machado Santaella; Karla Faria Vasconcelos; Deborah Queiroz de Freitas; Anne Caroline Oenning; Francisco Carlos Groppo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Evaluation of metal artefacts for two CBCT devices with a new dental arch phantom.

Authors:  Luciano Augusto Cano Martins; Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz; Yuri Nejaim; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Francisco Carlos Groppo; Francisco Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Mandibular cortical indices and their relation to gender and age in the cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Samir Goyushov; Erhan Dursun; Tolga Fikret Tözüm
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.