Literature DB >> 25473635

Assessment of CT numbers in limited and medium field-of-view scans taken using Accuitomo 170 and Veraviewepocs 3De cone-beam computed tomography scanners.

Matheus L Oliveira1, Guilherme M Tosoni2, David H Lindsey3, Kristopher Mendoza3, Sotirios Tetradis3, Sanjay M Mallya3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of anatomic location on the relationship between computed tomography (CT) number and X-ray attenuation in limited and medium field-of-view (FOV) scans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tubes containing solutions with different concentrations of K2HPO4 were placed in the tooth sockets of a human head phantom. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were acquired, and CT numbers of the K2HPO4 solutions were measured. The relationship between CT number and K2HPO4 concentration was examined by linear regression analyses. Then, the variation in CT number according to anatomic location was examined.
RESULTS: The relationship between K2HPO4 concentration and CT number was strongly linear. The slopes of the linear regressions for the limited FOVs were almost 2-fold lower than those for the medium FOVs. The absolute CT number differed between imaging protocols and anatomic locations.
CONCLUSION: There is a strong linear relationship between X-ray attenuation and CT number. The specific imaging protocol and anatomic location of the object strongly influence this relationship.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Imaging, Three-Dimensional

Year:  2014        PMID: 25473635      PMCID: PMC4245469          DOI: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.4.279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent        ISSN: 2233-7822


  18 in total

1.  Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  P Mah; T E Reeves; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Reliability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral density.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Nomura; Hiroshi Watanabe; Eiichi Honda; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography.

Authors:  Munetaka Naitoh; Akiko Hirukawa; Akitoshi Katsumata; Eiichiro Ariji
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Prospects and challenges of rendering tissue density in Hounsfield units for cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Roberto Molteni
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2013-07

5.  Effect of object location on the density measurement and Hounsfield conversion in a NewTom 3G cone beam computed tomography unit.

Authors:  M O Lagravère; J Carey; M Ben-Zvi; G V Packota; P W Major
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Isabela Maria de Carvalho Crusoé Silva; Deborah Queiroz de Freitas; Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Frab Norberto Bóscolo; Solange Maria Almeida
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

7.  Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.

Authors:  Azin Parsa; Norliza Ibrahim; Bassam Hassan; Alessandro Motroni; Paul van der Stelt; Daniel Wismeijer
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.

Authors:  A Parsa; N Ibrahim; B Hassan; A Motroni; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study.

Authors:  Michele Cassetta; Luigi Vito Stefanelli; Andrea Pacifici; Luciano Pacifici; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.932

10.  Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations.

Authors:  R Pauwels; O Nackaerts; N Bellaiche; H Stamatakis; K Tsiklakis; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Bogaerts; R Jacobs; K Horner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  4 in total

1.  Metallic materials in the exomass impair cone beam CT voxel values.

Authors:  Amanda P Candemil; Benjamin Salmon; Deborah Q Freitas; Glaucia Mb Ambrosano; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Matheus L Oliveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Influence of reconstruction parameters of micro-computed tomography on the analysis of bone mineral density.

Authors:  Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Danieli Moura Brasil; Daniela Verardi Madlum; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Christiano Oliveira-Santos
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2020-06-18

3.  Gender and growth variation in palatal bone thickness and density for mini-implant placement.

Authors:  Sumit Yadav; Emily Sachs; Meenakshi Vishwanath; Kristen Knecht; Madhur Upadhyay; Ravindra Nanda; Aditya Tadinada
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.750

4.  Diagnostic Performance of Conebeam CT Pixel Values in Active Fenestral Otosclerosis.

Authors:  F Deng; P Touska; K L Reinshagen; H D Curtin; A F Juliano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.966

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.