Guldane Magat1, Sevgi Ozcan Sener2. 1. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Karaciğan Mahallesi, No:A, Ankara Cd., No:74, 42050, Karatay/Konya, Turkey. gul_dent@hotmail.com. 2. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Karaciğan Mahallesi, No:A, Ankara Cd., No:74, 42050, Karatay/Konya, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare the fractal dimension (FD), bone area fraction (BAF), and gray scale value (GSV) on digital panoramic radiography (DPR) and cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using image analysis and to determine whether a relationship exists among parameters associated with bone quality. METHODS: Thirty edentulous human hemimandibles were scanned by DPR and CBCT. Ninety regions of interest (ROIs) were evaluated on DPR and CBCT images to calculate the FD and BAF. The GSV of the ROI on CBCT was also calculated. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed in the FD values of the ROIs between DPR and CBCT (p = 0.002) and in the BAF values of ROIs between DPR and CBCT (p = 0.017). The Spearman's correlation test revealed a statistically significant high correlation between the FD and BAF values of the ROIs on DPR and between the FD and BAF values of the ROIs on CBCT (p < 0.01). No significant correlations were observed between the GSVs of ROIs on CBCT and the FD values of ROIs on DPR, the BAF values of ROIs on DPR, the FD values of ROIs on CBCT, and the BAF values of ROIs on CBCT (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The GSV did not support the FD and BAF. Additionally, DPR and CBCT did not have similar image quality for assessing the FD, BAF, and GSV. In evaluating the trabecular structure, the use of panoramic radiographs should be continued because the image resolution of CBCT is lower and its generalized dose is higher than that of panoramic radiography. These results may serve as a reference for clinical practitioners using dental CBCT to analyze the trabecular structures of alveolar bones.
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare the fractal dimension (FD), bone area fraction (BAF), and gray scale value (GSV) on digital panoramic radiography (DPR) and cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using image analysis and to determine whether a relationship exists among parameters associated with bone quality. METHODS: Thirty edentulous human hemimandibles were scanned by DPR and CBCT. Ninety regions of interest (ROIs) were evaluated on DPR and CBCT images to calculate the FD and BAF. The GSV of the ROI on CBCT was also calculated. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed in the FD values of the ROIs between DPR and CBCT (p = 0.002) and in the BAF values of ROIs between DPR and CBCT (p = 0.017). The Spearman's correlation test revealed a statistically significant high correlation between the FD and BAF values of the ROIs on DPR and between the FD and BAF values of the ROIs on CBCT (p < 0.01). No significant correlations were observed between the GSVs of ROIs on CBCT and the FD values of ROIs on DPR, the BAF values of ROIs on DPR, the FD values of ROIs on CBCT, and the BAF values of ROIs on CBCT (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The GSV did not support the FD and BAF. Additionally, DPR and CBCT did not have similar image quality for assessing the FD, BAF, and GSV. In evaluating the trabecular structure, the use of panoramic radiographs should be continued because the image resolution of CBCT is lower and its generalized dose is higher than that of panoramic radiography. These results may serve as a reference for clinical practitioners using dental CBCT to analyze the trabecular structures of alveolar bones.
Entities:
Keywords:
Area fraction; Fractal; Gray scale value; Mandibula; Trabecular bone
Authors: Tannaz Shapurian; Petros D Damoulis; Gary M Reiser; Terrence J Griffin; William M Rand Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: André Weissheimer; Luciane Macedo de Menezes; Glenn T Sameshima; Reyes Enciso; John Pham; Dan Grauer Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Bruno Fontenele Carvalho; Julia Gonçalves Koehne de Castro; Nilce Santos de Melo; Paulo Tadeu de Souza Figueiredo; Carla Ruffeil Moreira-Mesquita; Ana Patrícia de Paula; Rafael Sindeaux; André Ferreira Leite Journal: Imaging Sci Dent Date: 2022-01-13