Literature DB >> 11273394

In search of remembrance: evidence for memory in visual search.

A Kristjánsson1.   

Abstract

Observers searched for a target among distractors while the display items traded places every 110 ms. Search was slower when the target was always relocated to a position previously occupied by a distractor than when the items remained in place, showing the importance of memory for locations in a visual search task. Experiment 2 repeated a previous study in which items could move to any location within the display, but used a larger range of set sizes than tested in the earlier study. A cost in search times to relocating items was found at the larger set sizes, most likely reflecting that the probability that the target would replace a distractor increased with the set size. The findings provide strong evidence for the role of memory for locations within trials in a visual search task.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11273394     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  24 in total

1.  Search for multiple targets: evidence for memory-based control of attention.

Authors:  Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

2.  Marking rejected distractors: a gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

3.  Memory processes in multiple-target visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-22

4.  Finding a new target in an old display: evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

5.  Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual search.

Authors:  Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

7.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

Review 9.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

10.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.