Literature DB >> 19640039

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission input/output characteristics in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

Stephen T Neely1, Tiffany A Johnson, Judy Kopun, Darcia M Dierking, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output (I/O) functions were measured in 322 ears of 176 subjects at as many as 8 f(2) frequencies per ear for a total of 1779 I/O functions. The f(2) frequencies ranged from 0.7 to 8 kHz in half-octave steps. Behavioral thresholds (BTs) at the f(2) frequencies ranged from -5 to 60 dB hearing loss (HL). Both linear-pressure and nonlinear, two-slope functions were fitted to the data. The two-slope function describes I/O compression as output-controlled self-suppression. Most I/O functions (96%) were better fitted by the two-slope method. DPOAE thresholds based on each method were used to predict BTs. Compared to estimates based on linear-pressure functions, individual BTs predicted from DPOAE thresholds based on the two-slope model had lower residual error and accounted for more variance. Another advantage of the two-slope method is that it provides an estimate of response growth rate (RGR) that is not tied to threshold. At all frequencies, the median low-level RGR (across I/O functions of the same f(2) and BT) usually increased as BT increased, while high-level compression decreased. The observed characteristics of DPOAE I/O functions are consistent with the loss of cochlear compression that is typically associated with mild-to-moderate HL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19640039      PMCID: PMC2730716          DOI: 10.1121/1.3158859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Values for clinical use.

Authors:  P Bonfils; P Avan
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1992-10

Review 2.  A review of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  R Probst; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: performance regarding sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics.

Authors:  D O Kim; J Paparello; M D Jung; J Smurzynski; X Sun
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  P Kummer; T Janssen; W Arnold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The use of cumulative distributions to determine critical values and levels of confidence for clinical distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  M P Gorga; L Stover; S T Neely; D Montoya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich; A Recio; S S Narayan; L Robles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation.

Authors:  D M Mills; S J Norton; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection.

Authors:  D M Mills; E W Rubel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies.

Authors:  J H Siegel; E T Hirohata
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss.

Authors:  M P Gorga; S T Neely; B Ohlrich; B Hoover; J Redner; J Peters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  17 in total

1.  Relation of distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions to loudness.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A Clinical Study of Effect of Hyperpyrexia on Otoacoustic Emissions in Children.

Authors:  V Ashok Murthy; K Spandana
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-04-26

3.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

5.  Growth of suppression using distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Cori Birkholz; Alyson Gruhlke; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.

Authors:  Amanda J Ortmann; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-08

8.  Cochlear supporting cells require GAS2 for cytoskeletal architecture and hearing.

Authors:  Tingfang Chen; Alex M Rohacek; Matthew Caporizzo; Amir Nankali; Jeroen J Smits; Jaap Oostrik; Cornelis P Lanting; Erdi Kücük; Christian Gilissen; Jiddeke M van de Kamp; Ronald J E Pennings; Staci M Rakowiecki; Klaus H Kaestner; Kevin K Ohlemiller; John S Oghalai; Hannie Kremer; Benjamin L Prosser; Douglas J Epstein
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their relation to loudness.

Authors:  Megan J Thorson; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

10.  Comparison of Behavioral and Physiological Measures of the Status of the Cochlear Nonlinearity.

Authors:  Michal Fereczkowski; Torsten Dau; Ewen N MacDonald
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.