Literature DB >> 9714917

Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits.

G K Martin1, D Jassir, B B Stagner, B L Lonsbury-Martin.   

Abstract

The suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) is commonly assumed to measure frequency selectivity, because the dominant features of suppression-tuning curves (STCs) are similar to the principal properties of the neural-tuning curves (NTCs) of single auditory-nerve fibers. In the present study, several common loop diuretics were used to affect the DPOAE-generation process to determine if reversible ototoxicity could adversely modify the characteristics of STCs, in a manner similar to that shown previously for NTCs. Contour plots of DPOAE level in the presence of a series of variable-level suppressor tones were obtained before and after administering diuretic drugs that reversibly reduced or eliminated DPOAEs. Primary-tone pairs were centered at 2.8 or 4 kHz, with L1 = L2, or L2 < L1. From the resulting plots, STC parameters including tip frequency, threshold at the tip frequency, and Q10 dB measures of tuning were extracted for four suppression criteria of 3, 6, 9, and 12 dB. In the pre-drug nonototoxic state, suppression tuning depended on both primary-tone level (L1, L2), and the relative levels of the primaries (L1-L2), with tuning being sharper for lower- than for higher-level equilevel primaries, and sharpest for offset-level primary tones. Following drug injection, the expected decrease in sharpness of tuning evidenced by changes in Q10 dB as well as the dramatically elevated tip thresholds normally seen for NTCs under similar conditions, were not observed. Overall, Q10 dB increased or decreased more or less randomly, with a slight tendency for STCs to become sharper than prior to drug dosing, for the two highest suppression criteria. The STC-tip frequencies demonstrated significant decreases following diuretic administration that were weakly correlated with the associated decreases in DPOAE amplitude. The most consistent changes in response to the drug-induced reduction in DPOAE level were increases in the STC-tip thresholds. However, these changes were relatively small and rarely exceeded 10 dB. In the absence of notable changes in overall STC shape, a major finding was a change in the effectiveness of suppression following ototoxic insult. However, when the amount of suppression was expressed as a percentage of the DPOAE remaining, the effects of diuretic dosing were often almost completely obscured. Overall, the results demonstrated that when the generation of DPOAEs was interfered with by the introduction of a suppressor tone to produce STCs that resemble NTCs, STCs behaved quite differently following reversible cochlear insult than their previously documented neural counterparts. These findings imply that STCs do not assess the frequency-selective aspects of the cochlear amplification process in a manner similar to NTCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9714917     DOI: 10.1121/1.423340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Influence of sound-conditioning on noise-induced susceptibility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Barden B Stagner; Glen K Martin; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Brenda M Hoover; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

4.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal aspects of suppression in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodriguez; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: results from cochlear mechanics simulation.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Alyson Gruhlke; Cori Birkholz; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Growth of suppression using distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Cori Birkholz; Alyson Gruhlke; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela E Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.