PURPOSE: Spectral∕multienergy CT has the potential to distinguish different materials by K-edge characteristics. K-edge imaging involves the two energy bins on both sides of a K-edge. The authors propose a K-edge imaging optimization model to determine these two energy bins. METHODS: K-edge image contrast with spectral CT depends on the specifications of the two energy bins on both sides of a K-edge in the attenuation profile of a relatively high atomic number material. The wider the energy bin width is, the lower the noise level is, and the poorer the reconstructed image contrast is. Here the authors introduce the signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) criterion to optimize the energy bin widths on both sides of the K-edge for the maximum SDNR. RESULTS: The authors study K-edge imaging with spectral CT, analyze the effect of K-edge energy bins on the resultant image quality, and establish guidelines for the optimization of energy thresholds. In simulation, the authors demonstrate that our K-edge imaging optimization approach maximizes SDNR in reconstructed images. CONCLUSIONS: This proposed approach can be readily generalized to deal with more general settings and determine the best energy bins for K-edge imaging.
PURPOSE: Spectral∕multienergy CT has the potential to distinguish different materials by K-edge characteristics. K-edge imaging involves the two energy bins on both sides of a K-edge. The authors propose a K-edge imaging optimization model to determine these two energy bins. METHODS: K-edge image contrast with spectral CT depends on the specifications of the two energy bins on both sides of a K-edge in the attenuation profile of a relatively high atomic number material. The wider the energy bin width is, the lower the noise level is, and the poorer the reconstructed image contrast is. Here the authors introduce the signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) criterion to optimize the energy bin widths on both sides of the K-edge for the maximum SDNR. RESULTS: The authors study K-edge imaging with spectral CT, analyze the effect of K-edge energy bins on the resultant image quality, and establish guidelines for the optimization of energy thresholds. In simulation, the authors demonstrate that our K-edge imaging optimization approach maximizes SDNR in reconstructed images. CONCLUSIONS: This proposed approach can be readily generalized to deal with more general settings and determine the best energy bins for K-edge imaging.
Authors: J P Schlomka; E Roessl; R Dorscheid; S Dill; G Martens; T Istel; C Bäumer; C Herrmann; R Steadman; G Zeitler; A Livne; R Proksa Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2008-07-08 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: X Wang; D Meier; S Mikkelsen; G E Maehlum; D J Wagenaar; B M W Tsui; B E Patt; E C Frey Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Yothin Rakvongthai; William Worstell; Georges El Fakhri; Junguo Bian; Auranuch Lorsakul; Jinsong Ouyang Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Jan Borggrefe; Victor-Frederic Neuhaus; Markus Le Blanc; Nils Grosse Hokamp; Volker Maus; Anastasios Mpotsaris; Simon Lennartz; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; David Maintz; Nuran Abdullayev Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Dalin Tang; Chun Yang; Jie Zheng; Gador Canton; Richard G Bach; Thomas S Hatsukami; Liang Wang; Deshan Yang; Kristen L Billiar; Chun Yuan Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 4.538