Literature DB >> 23125470

Recursively Imputed Survival Trees.

Ruoqing Zhu1, Michael R Kosorok.   

Abstract

We propose recursively imputed survival tree (RIST) regression for right-censored data. This new nonparametric regression procedure uses a novel recursive imputation approach combined with extremely randomized trees that allows significantly better use of censored data than previous tree based methods, yielding improved model fit and reduced prediction error. The proposed method can also be viewed as a type of Monte Carlo EM algorithm which generates extra diversity in the tree-based fitting process. Simulation studies and data analyses demonstrate the superior performance of RIST compared to previous methods.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 23125470      PMCID: PMC3486435          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2011.637468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  12 in total

1.  Bagging survival trees.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Berthold Lausen; Axel Benner; Martin Radespiel-Tröger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.

Authors:  Patrick J Heagerty; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Survival ensembles.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Peter Bühlmann; Sandrine Dudoit; Annette Molinaro; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Relative risk trees for censored survival data.

Authors:  M LeBlanc; J Crowley
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Yufan Zhao; Michael R Kosorok; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Consistency of Random Survival Forests.

Authors:  Hemant Ishwaran; Udaya B Kogalur
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 0.870

8.  Reinforcement learning strategies for clinical trials in nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yufan Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Mark A Socinski; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

10.  Randomized 2 x 2 trial evaluating hormonal treatment and the duration of chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. German Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  M Schumacher; G Bastert; H Bojar; K Hübner; M Olschewski; W Sauerbrei; C Schmoor; C Beyerle; R L Neumann; H F Rauschecker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  15 in total

1.  Doubly Robust Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment with Censored Data.

Authors:  Y Q Zhao; D Zeng; E B Laber; R Song; M Yuan; M R Kosorok
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Tree based weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment rules with censored data.

Authors:  Yifan Cui; Ruoqing Zhu; Michael Kosorok
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.125

3.  Reinforcement Learning Trees.

Authors:  Ruoqing Zhu; Donglin Zeng; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  L₁ splitting rules in survival forests.

Authors:  Hoora Moradian; Denis Larocque; François Bellavance
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Censoring Unbiased Regression Trees and Ensembles.

Authors:  Jon Arni Steingrimsson; Liqun Diao; Robert L Strawderman
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Greedy outcome weighted tree learning of optimal personalized treatment rules.

Authors:  Ruoqing Zhu; Ying-Qi Zhao; Guanhua Chen; Shuangge Ma; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Predicting survival time for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: An iterative imputation approach.

Authors:  Detian Deng; Yu Du; Zhicheng Ji; Karthik Rao; Zhenke Wu; Yuxin Zhu; R Yates Coley
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-11-16

8.  Estimating the Optimal Personalized Treatment Strategy Based on Selected Variables to Prolong Survival via Random Survival Forest with Weighted Bootstrap.

Authors:  Jincheng Shen; Lu Wang; Stephanie Daignault; Daniel E Spratt; Todd M Morgan; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  Standard errors and confidence intervals for variable importance in random forest regression, classification, and survival.

Authors:  Hemant Ishwaran; Min Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Combining parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric survival models with stacked survival models.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; John Connett; Kyle Rudser
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 5.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.