Literature DB >> 7931478

Randomized 2 x 2 trial evaluating hormonal treatment and the duration of chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. German Breast Cancer Study Group.

M Schumacher1, G Bastert, H Bojar, K Hübner, M Olschewski, W Sauerbrei, C Schmoor, C Beyerle, R L Neumann, H F Rauschecker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In 1984, the German Breast Cancer Study Group (GBSG) started a multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of three versus six cycles of 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 40 mg/m2 methotrexate, and 600 mg/m2 fluorouracil (CMF) on day 1 and 8 starting perioperatively with or without tamoxifen (TAM) (3 x 10 mg/d for 2 years). The aim of the trial was to compare recurrence-free and overall survival between the different treatment modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 5 years, 41 institutions randomized 473 patients (3 x CMF: 145; 3 x CMF + TAM: 93; 6 x CMF 144; 6 x CMF + TAM: 91). Until March 31, 1992, median follow-up time was 56 months with 197 events for disease-free survival and 116 deaths observed. This provides a power of approximately 80% to detect a potential treatment difference corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 0.67 for recurrence-free survival. Treatment modalities and various patient characteristics were evaluated by means of a multivariate Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: No significant difference in recurrence-free survival was observed with respect to hormonal therapy (RR = 0.75 TAM v no TAM; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 1.04; P = .08) as well as duration of chemotherapy (RR = 0.90 of 6 x CMF v 3 x CMF; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.19; P = .45). Similar results were obtained for overall survival. The multivariate analysis revealed a significant prognostic impact of the number of positive lymph nodes and the progesterone receptor level on recurrence-free survival. Compliance with chemotherapy within the range of 85% to 115% of the target dose was achieved in 94% and 78% of the patients randomized to 3 x CMF and 6 x CMF, respectively. Sufficient compliance with TAM was reported for 141 patients (93%).
CONCLUSION: At this stage of follow-up, six courses of CMF are not superior to three courses with respect to recurrence-free survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7931478     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

1.  Design and methods of "diaBEAT-it!": a hybrid preference/randomized control trial design using the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  Fabio A Almeida; Kimberlee A Pardo; Richard W Seidel; Brenda M Davy; Wen You; Sarah S Wall; Erin Smith; Mark H Greenawald; Paul A Estabrooks
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Tamoxifen plus chemotherapy versus tamoxifen alone as adjuvant therapies for node-positive postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: a stochastic economic evaluation.

Authors:  Jonathan Karnon; Jackie Brown
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  L₁ splitting rules in survival forests.

Authors:  Hoora Moradian; Denis Larocque; François Bellavance
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Testing a behavioral intervention to improve adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET).

Authors:  Rebecca A Shelby; Caroline S Dorfman; Hayden B Bosworth; Francis Keefe; Linda Sutton; Lynda Owen; Leonor Corsino; Alaattin Erkanli; Shelby D Reed; Sarah S Arthur; Tamara Somers; Nadine Barrett; Scott Huettel; Juan Marcos Gonzalez; Gretchen Kimmick
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Subgroups from regression trees with adjustment for prognostic effects and postselection inference.

Authors:  Wei-Yin Loh; Michael Man; Shuaicheng Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A regression tree approach to identifying subgroups with differential treatment effects.

Authors:  Wei-Yin Loh; Xu He; Michael Man
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Recursively Imputed Survival Trees.

Authors:  Ruoqing Zhu; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  The effect of patient choice of intervention on health outcomes.

Authors:  Noreen M Clark; Nancy K Janz; Julia A Dodge; Lori Mosca; Xihong Lin; Qi Long; Roderick J Little; John R C Wheeler; Steven Keteyian; Jersey Liang
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Inducible site-directed recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Y Zhang; C Riesterer; A M Ayrall; F Sablitzky; T D Littlewood; M Reth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Score and deviance residuals based on the full likelihood approach in survival analysis.

Authors:  Susan Halabi; Sandipan Dutta; Yuan Wu; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 1.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.