Literature DB >> 27379423

L₁ splitting rules in survival forests.

Hoora Moradian1, Denis Larocque2, François Bellavance1.   

Abstract

The log-rank test is used as the split function in many commonly used survival trees and forests algorithms. However, the log-rank test may have a significant loss of power in some circumstances, especially when the hazard functions or when the survival functions cross each other in the two compared groups. We investigate the use of the integrated absolute difference between the two children nodes survival functions as the splitting rule. Simulations studies and applications to real data sets show that forests built with this rule produce very good results in general, and that they are often better compared to forests built with the log-rank splitting rule.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ensemble methods; Random forests; Right-censored data; Survival data; Survival forests

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27379423     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-016-9372-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  14 in total

1.  Survival ensembles.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Peter Bühlmann; Sandrine Dudoit; Annette Molinaro; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Pathway hunting by random survival forests.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Investigating the prediction ability of survival models based on both clinical and omics data: two case studies.

Authors:  Riccardo De Bin; Willi Sauerbrei; Anne-Laure Boulesteix
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Evaluating Random Forests for Survival Analysis using Prediction Error Curves.

Authors:  Ulla B Mogensen; Hemant Ishwaran; Thomas A Gerds
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.440

5.  Tree-structured survival analysis.

Authors:  L Gordon; R A Olshen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-10

6.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Consistency of Random Survival Forests.

Authors:  Hemant Ishwaran; Udaya B Kogalur
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 0.870

Review 8.  Random forests for genomic data analysis.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  Randomized 2 x 2 trial evaluating hormonal treatment and the duration of chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. German Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  M Schumacher; G Bastert; H Bojar; K Hübner; M Olschewski; W Sauerbrei; C Schmoor; C Beyerle; R L Neumann; H F Rauschecker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Recursively Imputed Survival Trees.

Authors:  Ruoqing Zhu; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.033

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Selective Review on Random Survival Forests for High Dimensional Data.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Gang Li
Journal:  Quant Biosci       Date:  2017

2.  A comparison of the conditional inference survival forest model to random survival forests based on a simulation study as well as on two applications with time-to-event data.

Authors:  Justine B Nasejje; Henry Mwambi; Keertan Dheda; Maia Lesosky
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Application of random survival forests in understanding the determinants of under-five child mortality in Uganda in the presence of covariates that satisfy the proportional and non-proportional hazards assumption.

Authors:  Justine B Nasejje; Henry Mwambi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-09-07

4.  Clinical risk prediction with random forests for survival, longitudinal, and multivariate (RF-SLAM) data analysis.

Authors:  Shannon Wongvibulsin; Katherine C Wu; Scott L Zeger
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.