Literature DB >> 23015667

Multicenter clinical evaluation of the portrait toxigenic C. difficile assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains in clinical stool specimens.

Blake W Buchan1, Tami-Lea A Mackey, Judy A Daly, Garrison Alger, Gerald A Denys, Lance R Peterson, Sue C Kehl, Nathan A Ledeboer.   

Abstract

We compared the Portrait Toxigenic C. difficile Assay, a new semiautomated sample-to-result molecular test, to a toxigenic bacterial culture/cell cytotoxin neutralization assay (TBC/CCNA) for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in 549 stool specimens. Stool specimens were also tested by one of three alternative FDA-cleared molecular tests for toxigenic C. difficile (Xpert C. difficile, Illumigene C. difficile, or GeneOhm Cdiff). The sensitivities and specificities of the molecular tests compared to TBC/CCNA were as follows: 98.2% and 92.8% for the Portrait assay, 100% and 91.7% for the Xpert assay, 93.3% and 95.1% for the Illumigene assay, and 97.4% and 98.5% for the GeneOhm assay, respectively. The majority of Portrait false-positive results (20/31; 64.5%) were also positive for C. difficile by an alternative molecular test, suggesting an increased sensitivity compared to the culture-based "gold standard" method. The Portrait test detected an assay input of 30 CFU in 100% of spiked samples and detected an input of 10 CFU in 96.7% of samples tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23015667      PMCID: PMC3502949          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02083-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin.

Authors:  John R Ticehurst; Deborah Z Aird; Lisa M Dam; Anita P Borek; John T Hargrove; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile--more difficult than ever.

Authors:  Ciarán P Kelly; J Thomas LaMont
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Jonathan Swindells; Nigel Brenwald; Nathan Reading; Beryl Oppenheim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA).

Authors:  Stuart H Cohen; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson; Ciaran P Kelly; Vivian G Loo; L Clifford McDonald; Jacques Pepin; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Automated detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in clinical samples: isothermal tcdB amplification coupled to array-based detection.

Authors:  Brian Hicke; Chris Pasko; Benjamin Groves; Edward Ager; Maylene Corpuz; Georges Frech; Denton Munns; Wendy Smith; Ashley Warcup; Gerald Denys; Nathan A Ledeboer; Wes Lindsey; Charles Owen; Larry Rea; Robert Jenison
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.

Authors:  Susan M Novak-Weekley; Elizabeth M Marlowe; John M Miller; Joven Cumpio; Jim H Nomura; Paula H Vance; Alice Weissfeld
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.

Authors:  Kerrie Eastwood; Patrick Else; André Charlett; Mark Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Performance of the TechLab C. DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C. difficile Tox A/B II EIA kit, the Triage C. difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Heather Snell; Meredith Ramos; Sue Longo; Michael John; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Does my patient have Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Ari Robicsek
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Dena Lyras; Jennifer R O'Connor; Pauline M Howarth; Susan P Sambol; Glen P Carter; Tongted Phumoonna; Rachael Poon; Vicki Adams; Gayatri Vedantam; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding; Julian I Rood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  20 in total

1.  Comparison of GenomEra C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile as confirmatory tests in a multistep algorithm for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Luis Alcalá; Elena Reigadas; Mercedes Marín; Antonia Fernández-Chico; Pilar Catalán; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clostridium difficile outcomes difficult to generalize.

Authors:  Naresh Nagella; Kheng-Jim Lim; Khenj-Jim Lim; Amay Parikh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.

Authors:  Jari J Hirvonen; Silja Mentula; Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Emerging technologies for the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Comparison of Illumigene, Simplexa, and AmpliVue Clostridium difficile molecular assays for diagnosis of C. difficile infection.

Authors:  E Deak; S A Miller; R M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Multicenter evaluation of the Quidel Lyra Direct C. difficile nucleic acid amplification assay.

Authors:  Eric T Beck; Blake W Buchan; Katherine M Riebe; Brenda R Alkins; Preeti Pancholi; Paul A Granato; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Existing and Emerging Technologies for Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Andrew St John; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2014-08

8.  Evaluation of the Qiagen artus C. difficile QS-RGQ Kit for Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins A and B in Clinical Stool Specimens.

Authors:  Nathalie Jazmati; Pia Wiegel; Božica Ličanin; Georg Plum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Alerting physicians during electronic order entry effectively reduces unnecessary repeat PCR testing for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Robert F Luo; Suzanne Spradley; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) in Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Carolyn D Alonso; Mini Kamboj
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.