Literature DB >> 24352999

Comparison of Illumigene, Simplexa, and AmpliVue Clostridium difficile molecular assays for diagnosis of C. difficile infection.

E Deak1, S A Miller, R M Humphries.   

Abstract

We compared the performance of the Simplexa Universal Direct (Focus Diagnostics) and AmpliVue (Quidel Corporation) assays to that of the Illumigene assay (Meridian Bioscience, Inc.) for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. Two hundred deidentified remnant diarrheal stool specimens were tested by the Simplexa, AmpliVue, and Illumigene methods. Specimens with discrepant results among the three assays and a representative number of concordant specimens were further evaluated by toxigenic culture. The sensitivity and specificity were 98 and 100% and 96 and 100% for the Simplexa Universal Direct and AmpliVue assays, respectively. Both assays are easy to perform, with rapid turn-around-times, supporting their utility in the clinical laboratory as routine diagnostic platforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24352999      PMCID: PMC3957777          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02354-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  17 in total

1.  Using electronic health information to risk-stratify rates of Clostridium difficile infection in US hospitals.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Ying P Tabak; Dawn M Sievert; Karen G Derby; Richard S Johannes; Xiaowu Sun; L Clifford McDonald
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 2.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Multicenter clinical evaluation of the portrait toxigenic C. difficile assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains in clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Tami-Lea A Mackey; Judy A Daly; Garrison Alger; Gerald A Denys; Lance R Peterson; Sue C Kehl; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Valérie Lalande; Laurence Barrault; Sophie Wadel; Catherine Eckert; Jean-Claude Petit; Frédéric Barbut
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Epidemiological features of Clostridium difficile-associated disease among inpatients at children's hospitals in the United States, 2001-2006.

Authors:  Jason Kim; Sarah A Smathers; Priya Prasad; Kateri H Leckerman; Susan Coffin; Theoklis Zaoutis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Comparison of five cultural procedures for isolation of Clostridium difficile from stools.

Authors:  L M Marler; J A Siders; L C Wolters; Y Pettigrew; B L Skitt; S D Allen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity.

Authors:  Fred A Zar; Srinivasa R Bakkanagari; K M L S T Moorthi; Melinda B Davis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Does a rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection impact on quality of patient management?

Authors:  F Barbut; L Surgers; C Eckert; B Visseaux; M Cuingnet; C Mesquita; N Pradier; A Thiriez; N Ait-Ammar; A Aifaoui; E Grandsire; V Lalande
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 8.067

10.  Comparison of commercial molecular assays for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection in stools: BD GeneOhm Cdiff, XPert C. difficile and illumigene C. difficile.

Authors:  Céline Viala; Alban Le Monnier; Naouale Maataoui; Clotilde Rousseau; Anne Collignon; Isabelle Poilane
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 2.363

View more
  6 in total

1.  Molecular test based on isothermal helicase-dependent amplification for detection of the Clostridium difficile toxin A gene.

Authors:  Catherine Eckert; Eleonore Holscher; Amandine Petit; Valérie Lalande; Frédéric Barbut
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) in Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Carolyn D Alonso; Mini Kamboj
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Simultaneous detection and characterization of toxigenic Clostridium difficile directly from clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Hanjiang Lai; Chen Huang; Jian Cai; Julian Ye; Jun She; Yi Zheng; Liqian Wang; Yelin Wei; Weijia Fang; Xianjun Wang; Yi-Wei Tang; Yun Luo; Dazhi Jin
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Martina Neuendorf; Raquel Guadarrama-Gonzalez; Birgit Lamik; Colin R MacKenzie
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 5.  Current knowledge on the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Adrián Martínez-Meléndez; Adrián Camacho-Ortiz; Rayo Morfin-Otero; Héctor Jesús Maldonado-Garza; Licet Villarreal-Treviño; Elvira Garza-González
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Comparison of a novel chemiluminescent based algorithm to three algorithmic approaches for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  J Goret; J Blanchi; C Eckert; S Lacome; A Petit; F Barbut; C Bébéar; Francis Mégraud
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.181

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.