Literature DB >> 23804386

Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.

Jari J Hirvonen1, Silja Mentula, Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta.   

Abstract

We evaluated a new automated homogeneous PCR assay to detect toxigenic Clostridium difficile, the GenomEra C. difficile assay (Abacus Diagnostica, Finland), with 310 diarrheal stool specimens and with a collection of 33 known clostridial and nonclostridial isolates. Results were compared with toxigenic culture results, with discrepancies being resolved by the GeneXpert C. difficile PCR assay (Cepheid). Among the 80 toxigenic culture-positive or GeneXpert C. difficile assay-positive fecal specimens, 79 were also positive with the GenomEra C. difficile assay. Additionally, one specimen was positive with the GenomEra assay but negative with the confirmatory methods. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity were 98.8% and 99.6%, respectively. With the culture collection, no false-positive or -negative results were observed. The analytical sensitivity of the GenomEra C. difficile assay was approximately 5 CFU per PCR test. The short hands-on (<5 min for 1 to 4 samples) and total turnaround (<1 h) times, together with the high positive and negative predictive values (98.8% and 99.6%, respectively), make the GenomEra C. difficile assay an excellent option for toxigenic C. difficile detection in fecal specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23804386      PMCID: PMC3754623          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01083-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  44 in total

Review 1.  A review of mortality due to Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  J A Karas; D A Enoch; S H Aliyu
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 2.  Overcoming barriers to effective recognition and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  M H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

Authors:  Kimberle C Chapin; Roberta A Dickenson; Fongman Wu; Sarah B Andrea
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Evaluation of the C.Diff Quik Chek Complete Assay, a new glutamate dehydrogenase and A/B toxin combination lateral flow assay for use in rapid, simple diagnosis of clostridium difficile disease.

Authors:  Susan E Sharp; Lila O Ruden; Julie C Pohl; Patricia A Hatcher; Linda M Jayne; W Michael Ivie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Multicenter clinical evaluation of the portrait toxigenic C. difficile assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains in clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Tami-Lea A Mackey; Judy A Daly; Garrison Alger; Gerald A Denys; Lance R Peterson; Sue C Kehl; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid homogeneous PCR assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples.

Authors:  Ari Lehmusvuori; Etvi Juntunen; Antti-Heikki Tapio; Kaisu Rantakokko-Jalava; Tero Soukka; Timo Lövgren
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.363

7.  Impact of clinical symptoms on interpretation of diagnostic assays for Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke; Zhuolin Han; Linda Bobo; Tiffany Hink; Brenda Lawrence; Susan Copper; Joan Hoppe-Bauer; Carey-Ann D Burnham; William Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and taurocholate-CCFA for recovery of Clostridium difficile during surveillance of hospitalized patients.

Authors:  D Z Bliss; S Johnson; C R Clabots; K Savik; D N Gerding
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 9.  European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID): data review and recommendations for diagnosing Clostridium difficile-infection (CDI).

Authors:  M J T Crobach; O M Dekkers; M H Wilcox; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.067

10.  Comparison of a rapid molecular method, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, to the most frequently used laboratory tests for detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in diarrheal feces.

Authors:  Gabriella Terhes; Edit Urbán; József Sóki; Eniko Nacsa; Elisabeth Nagy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of GenomEra C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile as confirmatory tests in a multistep algorithm for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Luis Alcalá; Elena Reigadas; Mercedes Marín; Antonia Fernández-Chico; Pilar Catalán; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of BD Max Cdiff and GenomEra C. difficile molecular assays for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from stools in conventional sample containers and in FecalSwabs.

Authors:  J J Hirvonen; S-S Kaukoranta
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.

Authors:  Roosa Savolainen; Juha M Koskinen; Silja Mentula; Janne O Koskinen; Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Adults.

Authors:  Colleen S Kraft; J Scott Parrott; Nancy E Cornish; Matthew L Rubinstein; Alice S Weissfeld; Peggy McNult; Irving Nachamkin; Romney M Humphries; Thomas J Kirn; Jennifer Dien Bard; Joseph D Lutgring; Jonathan C Gullett; Cassiana E Bittencourt; Susan Benson; April M Bobenchik; Robert L Sautter; Vickie Baselski; Michel C Atlas; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Nancy S Miller; Monika Fischer; Sandra S Richter; Peter Gilligan; James W Snyder
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 26.132

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.