Literature DB >> 19652187

Does my patient have Clostridium difficile infection?

Lance R Peterson1, Ari Robicsek.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) seems to be changing-with increasing virulence and incidence, more resistance to metronidazole, and worse outcomes. Accurate diagnosis is critical, but 3 common misconceptions lead to misdiagnosis: Clostridium difficile infection is a possibility when the patient has fewer than 3 loose stools per day; the glutamate dehydrogenase test for CDI is sensitive and thus is a good initial test; and repeating an insensitive laboratory test for CDI is useful. These misconceptions can lead to missed diagnoses (for example, when tests with low sensitivity are used) and to false diagnoses (for example, when tests are done in patients who are unlikely to have CDI because they have minimal diarrhea or negative results on recent tests). Diagnoses of CDI will be more accurate if clinicians use tests with a higher sensitivity, reduce the frequency of testing for a single episode of diarrhea, and give more attention to key elements of the patient's history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19652187     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  31 in total

Review 1.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard.

Authors:  Torbjörn Norén; Ingegärd Alriksson; Josefin Andersson; Thomas Akerlund; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Recent epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Teena Chopra; Pranatharthi Chandrasekar; Hossein Salimnia; Lance K Heilbrun; Daryn Smith; George J Alangaden
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 4.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Ellen Jo Baron; Lance R Peterson; David H Persing
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Modifications of commercial toxigenic Clostridium difficile PCR resulting in improved economy and workflow efficiency.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Dorothy Bilbo; Mary Paul; Maureen Napierala; Jeanne E Hryciuk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Reducing Unnecessary and Duplicate Ordering for Ovum and Parasite Examinations and Clostridium difficile PCR in Immunocompromised Patients by Using an Alert at the Time of Request in the Order Management System.

Authors:  Caitlin C Otto; Susan L Shuptar; Philippe Milord; Connor J Essick; Reshma Nevrekar; Svetlana L Granovsky; Susan K Seo; N Esther Babady; Steven C Martin; Yi-Wei Tang; Melissa S Pessin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Easily modified factors contribute to delays in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: a cohort study and intervention.

Authors:  Sirisha Kundrapu; Lucy A Jury; Brett Sitzlar; Venkata C K Sunkesula; Ajay K Sethi; Curtis J Donskey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of Correlation between Pretest Probability for Clostridium difficile Infection and Clostridium difficile Enzyme Immunoassay Results.

Authors:  Jennie H Kwon; Kimberly A Reske; Tiffany Hink; C A Burnham; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Host response to Clostridium difficile infection: Diagnostics and detection.

Authors:  Elena A Usacheva; Jian-P Jin; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.035

10.  Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.

Authors:  Susan M Novak-Weekley; Elizabeth M Marlowe; John M Miller; Joven Cumpio; Jim H Nomura; Paula H Vance; Alice Weissfeld
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.