Literature DB >> 25336761

Existing and Emerging Technologies for Point-of-Care Testing.

Andrew St John1, Christopher P Price2.   

Abstract

The volume of point-of-care testing (PoCT) has steadily increased over the 40 or so years since its widespread introduction. That growth is likely to continue, driven by changes in healthcare delivery which are aimed at delivering less costly care closer to the patient's home. In the developing world there is the challenge of more effective care for infectious diseases and PoCT may play a much greater role here in the future. PoCT technologies can be split into two categories, but in both, testing is generally performed by technologies first devised more than two decades ago. These technologies have undoubtedly been refined and improved to deliver easier-to-use devices with incremental improvements in analytical performance. Of the two major categories the first is small handheld devices, providing qualitative or quantitative determination of an increasing range of analytes. The dominant technologies here are glucose biosensor strips and lateral flow strips using immobilised antibodies to determine a range of parameters including cardiac markers and infectious pathogens. The second category of devices are larger, often bench-top devices which are essentially laboratory instruments which have been reduced in both size and complexity. These include critical care analysers and, more recently, small haematology and immunology analysers. New emerging devices include those that are utilising molecular techniques such as PCR to provide infectious disease testing in a sufficiently small device to be used at the point of care. This area is likely to grow with many devices being developed and likely to reach the commercial market in the next few years.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25336761      PMCID: PMC4204237     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev        ISSN: 0159-8090


  49 in total

Review 1.  Rapid tests for sexually transmitted infections (STIs): the way forward.

Authors:  R W Peeling; K K Holmes; D Mabey; A Ronald
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Comparison of urine dipsticks with quantitative methods for microalbuminuria.

Authors:  M J Pugia; J A Lott; L W Clark; D R Parker; J F Wallace; T W Willis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1997-09

3.  Tattoo-based potentiometric ion-selective sensors for epidermal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Amay J Bandodkar; Vinci W S Hung; Wenzhao Jia; Gabriela Valdés-Ramírez; Joshua R Windmiller; Alexandra G Martinez; Julian Ramírez; Garrett Chan; Kagan Kerman; Joseph Wang
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.616

4.  Reflotron assays of alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase in whole-blood samples evaluated.

Authors:  D R James; C P Price
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Multicenter clinical evaluation of the portrait toxigenic C. difficile assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains in clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Tami-Lea A Mackey; Judy A Daly; Garrison Alger; Gerald A Denys; Lance R Peterson; Sue C Kehl; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Effects of measurement frequency on analytical quality required for glucose measurements in intensive care units: assessments by simulation models.

Authors:  James C Boyd; David E Bruns
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  A new rapid molecular point-of-care assay for Trichomonas vaginalis: preliminary performance data.

Authors:  David M Pearce; David N Styles; Justin P Hardick; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Performance of the Cepheid CT/NG Xpert Rapid PCR Test for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Barbara Van Der Pol; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Nicole Quinn; Carey Clark; Grace E Daniel; Paula B Dixon; Edward W Hook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Measurement of CD4+ T cells in point-of-care settings with the Sysmex pocH-100i haematological analyser.

Authors:  C Briggs; S Machin; M Müller; W Haase; K Hofmann; F Forstreuter; R Hinzmann
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Field evaluation of a prototype paper-based point-of-care fingerstick transaminase test.

Authors:  Nira R Pollock; Sarah McGray; Donn J Colby; Farzad Noubary; Huyen Nguyen; The Anh Nguyen; Sariah Khormaee; Sidhartha Jain; Kenneth Hawkins; Shailendra Kumar; Jason P Rolland; Patrick D Beattie; Nguyen V Chau; Vo M Quang; Cori Barfield; Kathy Tietje; Matt Steele; Bernhard H Weigl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  108 in total

1.  Implications of direct amplification for measuring antimicrobial resistance using point-of-care devices.

Authors:  M R Williams; R D Stedtfeld; H Waseem; T Stedtfeld; B Upham; W Khalife; B Etchebarne; M Hughes; J M Tiedje; S A Hashsham
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Fast, Sensitive, and Quantitative Point-of-Care Platform for the Assessment of Drugs of Abuse in Urine, Serum, and Whole Blood.

Authors:  Ying Li; Uvaraj Uddayasankar; Bangshun He; Ping Wang; Lidong Qin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  The march of technology through the clinical laboratory and beyond.

Authors:  Andrew St John; Christopher Price
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2014-08

4.  Smartphone operable centrifugal system (SOCS) for on-site DNA extraction from foodborne bacterial pathogen.

Authors:  Soon Woo Jeong; Yoo Min Park; Sung Hee Jo; Seok Jae Lee; Yong Tae Kim; Kyoung G Lee
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 5.  Review of the Current State of Urine Drug Testing in Chronic Pain: Still Effective as a Clinical Tool and Curbing Abuse, or an Arcane Test?

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Aneesh Goel; George M Jeha; Alan David Kaye; Paul J Christo
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2021-02-17

6.  Flow reproducibility of whole blood and other bodily fluids in simplified no reaction lateral flow assay devices.

Authors:  H Li; D Han; M A Hegener; G M Pauletti; A J Steckl
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Inkjet-printed point-of-care immunoassay on a nanoscale polymer brush enables subpicomolar detection of analytes in blood.

Authors:  Daniel Y Joh; Angus M Hucknall; Qingshan Wei; Kelly A Mason; Margaret L Lund; Cassio M Fontes; Ryan T Hill; Rebecca Blair; Zackary Zimmers; Rohan K Achar; Derek Tseng; Raluca Gordan; Michael Freemark; Aydogan Ozcan; Ashutosh Chilkoti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Nucleic acid sample preparation from whole blood in a paper microfluidic device using isotachophoresis.

Authors:  Benjamin P Sullivan; Andrew T Bender; Duy N Ngyuen; Jane Yuqian Zhang; Jonathan D Posner
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 3.205

9.  Analysis of circulating non-coding RNAs in a non-invasive and cost-effective manner.

Authors:  Yu-Min Wang; Michael Patrick Trinh; Yongzan Zheng; Kaizhu Guo; Luis A Jimenez; Wenwan Zhong
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 12.296

10.  Paper-based fluorogenic RNA aptamer sensors for label-free detection of small molecules.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shafiei; Kathleen McAuliffe; Yousef Bagheri; Zhining Sun; Qikun Yu; Rigumula Wu; Mingxu You
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.