Literature DB >> 24671790

Multicenter evaluation of the Quidel Lyra Direct C. difficile nucleic acid amplification assay.

Eric T Beck1, Blake W Buchan2, Katherine M Riebe1, Brenda R Alkins3, Preeti Pancholi4, Paul A Granato3, Nathan A Ledeboer5.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive bacterium commonly found in health care and long-term-care facilities and is the most common cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Rapid detection of this bacterium can assist physicians in implementing contact precautions and appropriate antibiotic therapy in a timely manner. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical performance of the Quidel Lyra Direct C. difficile assay (Lyra assay) (Quidel, San Diego, CA) to that of a direct cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) and enhanced toxigenic culture. This study was performed at three geographically diverse laboratories within the United States using residual stool specimens submitted for routine C. difficile testing. Residual samples were tested using the Lyra assay on three real-time PCR platforms, and results were compared to those for direct CCNA and enhanced toxigenic culture. The test results for all platforms were consistent across all three test sites. The sensitivity and specificity of the Lyra assay on the SmartCycler II, ABI 7500 Fast DX, and ABI QuantStudio DX instruments compared to CCNA were 90.0% and 93.3%, 95.0% and 94.2%, and 93.8% and 95.0%, respectively. Compared to enhanced toxigenic culture, the sensitivity and specificity of the Lyra assay on the SmartCycler II, ABI 7500, and QuantStudio instruments were 82.1% and 96.9%, 89.3% and 98.8%, and 85.7% and 99.0%, respectively. Overall, the Lyra assay is easy to use and versatile and compares well to C. difficile culture methods.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671790      PMCID: PMC4042815          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03089-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

1.  Clinical usefulness of components of the Triage immunoassay, enzyme immunoassay for toxins A and B, and cytotoxin B tissue culture assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile diarrhea.

Authors:  Viki Massey; Daniel B Gregson; Abdul H Chagla; Miriam Storey; Michael A John; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile: epidemiology, pathogenesis, management, and prevention of a recalcitrant healthcare-associated pathogen.

Authors:  Victor O Badger; Nate A Ledeboer; Mary Beth Graham; Charles E Edmiston
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Overcoming barriers to effective recognition and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  M H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 5.  Tests for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: the next generation.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.331

6.  Multicenter clinical evaluation of the portrait toxigenic C. difficile assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains in clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Tami-Lea A Mackey; Judy A Daly; Garrison Alger; Gerald A Denys; Lance R Peterson; Sue C Kehl; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Automated detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in clinical samples: isothermal tcdB amplification coupled to array-based detection.

Authors:  Brian Hicke; Chris Pasko; Benjamin Groves; Edward Ager; Maylene Corpuz; Georges Frech; Denton Munns; Wendy Smith; Ashley Warcup; Gerald Denys; Nathan A Ledeboer; Wes Lindsey; Charles Owen; Larry Rea; Robert Jenison
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.

Authors:  Susan M Novak-Weekley; Elizabeth M Marlowe; John M Miller; Joven Cumpio; Jim H Nomura; Paula H Vance; Alice Weissfeld
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of a new commercial TaqMan PCR assay for direct detection of the clostridium difficile toxin B gene in clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Wisal Babiker; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Linda Gluck; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Does a rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection impact on quality of patient management?

Authors:  F Barbut; L Surgers; C Eckert; B Visseaux; M Cuingnet; C Mesquita; N Pradier; A Thiriez; N Ait-Ammar; A Aifaoui; E Grandsire; V Lalande
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 8.067

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Masako Mizusawa
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

2.  In vivo commensal control of Clostridioides difficile virulence.

Authors:  Brintha P Girinathan; Nicholas DiBenedetto; Jay N Worley; Johann Peltier; Mario L Arrieta-Ortiz; Selva Rupa Christinal Immanuel; Richard Lavin; Mary L Delaney; Christopher K Cummins; Maria Hoffman; Yan Luo; Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona; Marc Allard; Andrew B Onderdonk; Georg K Gerber; Abraham L Sonenshein; Nitin S Baliga; Bruno Dupuy; Lynn Bry
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 21.023

Review 3.  Current knowledge on the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Adrián Martínez-Meléndez; Adrián Camacho-Ortiz; Rayo Morfin-Otero; Héctor Jesús Maldonado-Garza; Licet Villarreal-Treviño; Elvira Garza-González
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Adults.

Authors:  Colleen S Kraft; J Scott Parrott; Nancy E Cornish; Matthew L Rubinstein; Alice S Weissfeld; Peggy McNult; Irving Nachamkin; Romney M Humphries; Thomas J Kirn; Jennifer Dien Bard; Joseph D Lutgring; Jonathan C Gullett; Cassiana E Bittencourt; Susan Benson; April M Bobenchik; Robert L Sautter; Vickie Baselski; Michel C Atlas; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Nancy S Miller; Monika Fischer; Sandra S Richter; Peter Gilligan; James W Snyder
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Laboratory Diagnostic Methods for Clostridioides difficile Infection: the First Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Korea.

Authors:  Hae-Sun Chung; Jeong Su Park; Bo-Moon Shin
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing.

Authors:  Yanal M Murad; Justo Perez; Gustavo Ybazeta; Sarah Mavin; Sebastien Lefebvre; J Scott Weese; Joyce Rousseau; Francisco Diaz-Mitoma; Reza Nokhbeh
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.090

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.