Literature DB >> 23001415

CT-navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoracolumbar spine: single center experience of 4,500 screws.

Albrecht Waschke1, Jan Walter, Pedro Duenisch, Rupert Reichart, Rolf Kalff, Christian Ewald.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Single center evaluation of the placement accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screws implanted either with fluoroscopy or under CT-navigation using 3D-reconstruction and intraoperative computed tomography control of the screw position. There is in fact a huge variation in the reported placement accuracy of pedicle screws, especially concerning the screw placement under conventional fluoroscopy most notably due to the lack of the definition of screw misplacement, combined with a potpourri of postinstrumentation evaluation methods.
METHODS: The operation data of 1,006 patients operated on in our clinic between 1995 and 2005 is analyzed retrospectively. There were 2,422 screws placed with the help of CT-navigation compared to 2,002 screws placed under fluoroscopy. The postoperative computed tomography images were reviewed by a radiologist and an independent spine surgeon.
RESULTS: In the lumbar spine, the placement accuracy was 96.4 % for CT-navigated screws and 93.9 % for pedicle screws placed under fluoroscopy, respectively. This difference in accuracy was statistically significant (Fishers Exact Test, p = 0.001). The difference in accuracy became more impressing in the thoracic spine, with a placement accuracy of 95.5 % in the CT-navigation group, compared to 79.0 % accuracy in the fluoroscopy group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This study underlines the relevance of CT-navigation-guided pedicle screw placement, especially when instrumentation of the middle and upper thoracic spine is carried out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001415      PMCID: PMC3585623          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2509-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T Laine; T Lund; M Ylikoski; J Lohikoski; D Schlenzka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws.

Authors:  P J Belmont; W R Klemme; A Dhawan; D W Polly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of computed tomography in assessment of thoracic pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ganesh Rao; Darrel S Brodke; Matthew Rondina; Kent Bacchus; Andrew T Dailey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Assessment of pedicle screw placement utilizing conventional radiography and computed tomography: a proposed systematic approach to improve accuracy of interpretation.

Authors:  Thomas J Learch; Jennifer B Massie; Mini N Pathria; Bradley A Ahlgren; Steven R Garfin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  [Accuracy of CT-based navitation of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine compared with conventional technique].

Authors:  K J Schnake; B König; U Berth; R J Schroeder; F Kandziora; U Stöckle; M Raschke; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Accuracy of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using the oblique or "owl's-eye" view and novel guidance technology.

Authors:  Cary Idler; Kevin W Rolfe; Josef E Gorek
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-10

7.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement with the assistance of lateral plain radiography.

Authors:  C J Odgers; A R Vaccaro; M E Pollack; J M Cotler
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1996-08

8.  Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo.

Authors:  S D Gertzbein; S E Robbins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw fixation for thoracic and thoracolumbar injuries: technique and short-term complications.

Authors:  John J Carbone; P Justin Tortolani; Louis G Quartararo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Prospective evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement using fluoroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Charles Kuntz; P Colby Maher; Nicholas B Levine; Ryu Kurokawa
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-06
View more
  42 in total

1.  Pedicle screw placement accuracy in thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery with a patient-matched targeting guide: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Riccardo Cecchinato; Zsolt Fekete; Alberto Lipari; Meinrad Fiechter; P Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw accuracy with a mini-open approach: a tomographic evaluation of 470 screws in 125 patients.

Authors:  José Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Luis Alberto Ortega-Porcayo; Carlos Francisco Gutiérrez-Partida; Luis Rodolfo Ramírez-Barrios; Ramses Uriel Ortíz-Leyva; Manuel Rodríguez-García; Oscar Sánchez-Escandón
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-10-23

Review 3.  Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Meng; Xiao-Fei Guan; Hai-Long Zhang; Shi-Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Accuracy of thoracolumbar transpedicular and vertebral body percutaneous screw placement: coupling the Rosa® Spine robot with intraoperative flat-panel CT guidance--a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Lefranc; J Peltier
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-22

5.  Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and lumbar spine instrumentation using navigation based on an intraoperative cone beam CT imaging system: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nathalie Pireau; Virginie Cordemans; Xavier Banse; Nadia Irda; Sébastien Lichtherte; Ludovic Kaminski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  The evolution of image-guided lumbosacral spine surgery.

Authors:  Austin C Bourgeois; Austin R Faulkner; Alexander S Pasciak; Yong C Bradley
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-04

Review 7.  Multilevel mini-open TLIFs and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: description of a simple technical nuance used to increase intraoperative safety and improve workflow. Tips and tricks and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Francesco Certo; Massimiliano Visocchi; Giovanni Sciacca; Mario Piccini; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Accuracy and workflow of navigated spinal instrumentation with the mobile AIRO(®) CT scanner.

Authors:  Nils Hecht; Marije Kamphuis; Marcus Czabanka; Bernd Hamm; Susanne König; Johannes Woitzik; Michael Synowitz; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Reduction in complication and revision rates for robotic-guided short-segment lumbar fusion surgery: results of a prospective, multi-center study.

Authors:  Jason I Liounakos; Vignessh Kumar; Aria Jamshidi; Zmira Silman; Christopher R Good; Samuel R Schroerlucke; Andrew Cannestra; Victor Hsu; Jae Lim; Faissal Zahrawi; Pedro M Ramirez; Thomas M Sweeney; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-01

10.  The Use of Image-Guided Navigation Systems During Spine Surgeries in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Thamer M Alraiyes; Abdulrhman Alrajhi; Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar; Abdulrahman Zekry; Naif M Alotaibi; Sami Aleissa; Zayed Alzayed
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.