Literature DB >> 25391632

Multilevel mini-open TLIFs and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: description of a simple technical nuance used to increase intraoperative safety and improve workflow. Tips and tricks and review of the literature.

Giuseppe M V Barbagallo1, Francesco Certo, Massimiliano Visocchi, Giovanni Sciacca, Mario Piccini, Vincenzo Albanese.   

Abstract

We describe a technical variation used to enhance intraoperative safety and efficiency in multilevel percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSFs) and mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (m-TLIFs). A review of the literature on percutaneous screw insertion techniques and related pitfalls is presented. PPSFs and m-TLIFs are increasingly used techniques in multilevel lumbar degenerative disease. Facetectomy and TLIF are usually performed before inserting ipsilateral pedicle screws. Such techniques can cause unintended violation of the pedicle and injure the dura or neural structures, particularly in multilevel cases. A literature review revealed a lack of intraoperative and fluoroscopic images detailing the technique for multilevel PPSF and m-TLIF(s) performed through tubular, expandable retractors. Thirteen patients with two- to four-level disease underwent multilevel PPSF and m-TLIF (one to four levels). The Kirschner Cage Screw (KCS) technique, consisting of early insertion of K-wires in all pedicles followed by facetectomy and m-TLIF(s) and, finally, screw insertion, was used in order to minimize the risk of dural/neural injuries. Neither CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) leaks nor nerve root injuries nor technique-related complications were encountered with a follow-up ranging from 7 to 38 months (mean 23.6). In conclusion, the KCS technique allows safe identification of the pedicles without opening the canal during m-TLIF(s). Moreover, by visualizing the K-wires inside the retractor, the surgeon can check the pedicle position during facetectomy, and screws can be introduced with a minimal risk of neural or dural injuries. We believe that the proposed technique increases the safety and ease of the procedure, particularly in multilevel cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25391632     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-014-0589-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  58 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Isaac O Karikari; Robert E Isaacs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Will F Beringer; Jean-Pierre Mobasser
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation.

Authors:  Robert E Isaacs; Vinod K Podichetty; Paul Santiago; Faheem A Sandhu; John Spears; Kevin Kelly; Laurie Rice; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-08

4.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience.

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Nicolas Tzinieris; Elefterios Tsiridis; Victor Kosmopoulos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial.

Authors:  J W Brantigan; A D Steffee; M L Lewis; L M Quinn; J M Persenaire
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Perioperative complications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS): comparison of MIS and open interbody fusion techniques.

Authors:  Bradley Bagan; Nimesh Patel; Harel Deutsch; James Harrop; Ashwini Sharan; Alexander R Vaccaro; John K Ratliff
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2008

7.  Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Moon-Chan Kim; Hung-Tae Chung; Jae-Lim Cho; Dong-Jun Kim; Nam-Su Chung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Harel Deutsch; Michael J Musacchio
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  Paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Technical note and preliminary report on 47 cases.

Authors:  Jonathan Tuttle; Ahmed Shakir; Haroon Fiaz Choudhri
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.047

10.  Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability.

Authors:  Kai-Michael Scheufler; Hildegard Dohmen; Vassilios I Vougioukas
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.