Literature DB >> 26686852

Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis.

Xiao-Tong Meng1, Xiao-Fei Guan1, Hai-Long Zhang1, Shi-Sheng He2.   

Abstract

Although application of intraoperative computer navigation technique had been integrated into placement of pedicle screws (PSs) in thoracic fusion for years, its security and practicability remain controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy, the operative time consumption, the amount of intraoperative blood loss, time of pedicle insertion and the incidence of complications of thoracic pedicle screw placement in patients with thoracic diseases such as scoliosis and kyphosis. Pubmed, Web of Knowledge, and Google scholar were searched to identify comparative studies of thoracic pedicle screw placement between intraoperative computer navigation and fluoroscopy-guided navigation. Outcomes of malposition rate, operative time consumption, insertion time, intraoperative blood loss, and the incidence of complications are evaluated. Fourteen articles including 1723 patients and 9019 PSs were identified matching inclusion criteria. The malposition rate was lower (RR: 0.33, 95 % CI: 0.28-0.38, P < 0.01) in computer navigation group than that in fluoroscopy-guided navigation group; the operative time was significantly longer [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 23.66, 95 % CI: 14.74-32.57, P < 0.01] in computer navigation group than that in fluoroscopy-guided navigation group. The time of insertion was shorter (WMD = -1.88, 95 % CI: -2.25- -1.52, P < 0.01) in computer navigation group than that in fluoroscopy-guided navigation group. The incidence of complications was lower (RR = 0. 23, 95 % CI: 0.12-0.46, P < 0.01) in computer navigation group than that in the other group. The intraoperative blood loss was fewer (WMD = -167.49, 95 % CI: -266.39- -68.58, P < 0.01) in computer navigation group than that in the other. In conclusion, the meta-analysis of thoracic pedicle screw placement studies clearly demonstrated lower malposition rate, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer complications when using computer navigation. This result provides strong evidence that computer technology could be safer and more reliable than fluoroscopy-guided navigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraoperative computer navigation; Meta-analysis; Pedicle screw placement; Thoracic interbody fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26686852     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-015-0679-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  38 in total

1.  Minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Florian Ringel; Michael Stoffel; Carsten Stüer; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  [Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in thoracic-lumbar fracture using mini-invasive pedicle screw system guided by navigation].

Authors:  Qin Li; Wei Tian; Bo Liu; Lin Hu; Zhi-yu Li; Qiang Yuan
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2007-05-22

3.  Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery.

Authors:  P Merloz; J Troccaz; H Vouaillat; C Vasile; J Tonetti; A Eid; S Plaweski
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a randomized comparison study of computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques.

Authors:  Han Wu; Zhong-li Gao; Jin-cheng Wang; Ying-pu Li; Peng Xia; Rui Jiang
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2010-08-01

5.  Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine: comparison between free hand and a generic 3D-based navigation techniques.

Authors:  Yasser Allam; J Silbermann; F Riese; R Greiner-Perth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Spinal pedicle fixation. Confirmation of an image-based technique for screw placement.

Authors:  J C Steinmann; H N Herkowitz; H el-Kommos; D P Wesolowski
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Nikolaos K Paschos; Emilios E Pakos; Angelos N Politis; Christina M Arnaoutoglou; Athanasios C Karageorgos; Avraam Ploumis; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Use of O-arm for spinal surgery in academic institution in India: experience from JPN apex trauma centre.

Authors:  Pankaj Ailawadhi; Deepak Agrawal; G D Satyarthee; D Gupta; S Sinha; A K Mahapatra
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Screw placement accuracy for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a study on 3-d neuronavigation-guided surgery.

Authors:  Jorge Torres; Andrew R James; Marjan Alimi; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Christian Geannette; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-09

10.  Accuracy and Safety in Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spines : Comparison Study between Conventional C-Arm Fluoroscopy and Navigation Coupled with O-Arm® Guided Methods.

Authors:  Myung-Hoon Shin; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-09-30
View more
  17 in total

1.  Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  A Aichmair; M Moser; M R Bauer; E Bachmann; J G Snedeker; M Betz; M Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prospective Evaluation of the Time Required for Insertion of 380 Lumbar and Sacral Pedicle Screws Using Navigation with an Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Imaging System.

Authors:  Benjamin Tze Keong Ding; Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal; Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh; Chun-Sing Yu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

3.  Clinical efficiency of operating room-based sliding gantry CT as compared to mobile cone-beam CT-based navigated pedicle screw placement in 853 patients and 6733 screws.

Authors:  Sebastian Ille; Lea Baumgart; Thomas Obermueller; Bernhard Meyer; Sandro M Krieg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Vertebrae segmentation in reduced radiation CT imaging for augmented reality applications.

Authors:  Ethan Schonfeld; Madeleine de Lotbiniere-Bassett; Tatiana Jansen; Diana Anthony; Anand Veeravagu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Robotic-guided placement of cervical pedicle screws: feasibility and accuracy.

Authors:  Stanley Kisinde; Xiaobang Hu; Shea Hesselbacher; Alexander M Satin; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Less Invasive Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: The Case for Robotic-Assisted Placement of Pedicle Screws.

Authors:  Kyle W Morse; Hila Otremski; Kira Page; Roger F Widmann
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-08

7.  Two-dimensional C-arm robotic navigation system (i-Navi) in spine surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Zhao-Quan Liu; Cheng-Ta Hsieh; Wei-En Hsu; Ching-Shiow Tseng; Chih-Ju Chang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.421

8.  Comparison of three imaging and navigation systems regarding accuracy of pedicle screw placement in a sawbone model.

Authors:  Nils Beisemann; Jula Gierse; Eric Mandelka; Frank Hassel; Paul A Grützner; Jochen Franke; Sven Y Vetter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Michael Betz; Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Manuel Moser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Radiation Exposure in Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of CT Image-Guided Navigation, Robotic Assistance, and Intraoperative Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Erik Wang; Jordan Manning; Christopher G Varlotta; Dainn Woo; Ethan Ayres; Edem Abotsi; Dennis Vasquez-Montes; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Jeffrey A Goldstein; Anthony K Frempong-Boadu; Peter G Passias; Aaron J Buckland
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.