Literature DB >> 14624089

Inter- and intraobserver reliability of computed tomography in assessment of thoracic pedicle screw placement.

Ganesh Rao1, Darrel S Brodke, Matthew Rondina, Kent Bacchus, Andrew T Dailey.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Reliability study of computed tomography imaging in 12 cadaver specimens instrumented with titanium or stainless steel thoracic pedicle screws.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate inter- and intraobserver reliability of computed tomography scan in determining the accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement and to identify the differences in observers' agreement when viewing stainless steel versus titanium screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Computed tomography is often used to assess the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Accuracy of screw placement is important in the thoracic spine where pedicle morphometry increases the difficulty of screw placement (vital structures are at increased risk). The current literature lacks a critical evaluation of computed tomography reliability among observers.
METHODS: Twelve adult cadavers were instrumented with thoracic pedicle screws. Nine cadavers were instrumented with titanium screws and three with stainless steel screws. The spines were imaged with computed tomography. Three observers used a grading scale to score the extent of pedicle violation and independently scored the placement of each pedicle screw on three separate occasions. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement were determined by using the kappa statistic.
RESULTS: The mean kappa score for interobserver agreement for all 12 specimens (including titanium and stainless steel screws) was 0.51, which correlates with a moderate degree of agreement. Although the interobserver kappa statistics for titanium (kappa = 0.53) and stainless screws (kappa = 0.44) showed a moderate degree of agreement, the intraobserver reliability was substantial (kappa = 0.63). The mean intraobserver kappa for titanium screws was 0.63 and for stainless steel screws was 0.62.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that interobserver agreement is moderate and intraobserver agreement is substantial when computed tomography is used to assess placement of thoracic pedicle screws. We conclude that computed tomography is reliable for evaluating thoracic pedicle screw placement throughout the thoracic spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14624089     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092341.56793.F1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Rate and mode of screw misplacements after 3D-fluoroscopy navigation-assisted insertion and 3D-imaging control of 1547 pedicle screws in spinal levels T10-S1 related to vertebrae and spinal sections.

Authors:  Horst Balling; Thomas R Blattert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  CT-navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoracolumbar spine: single center experience of 4,500 screws.

Authors:  Albrecht Waschke; Jan Walter; Pedro Duenisch; Rupert Reichart; Rolf Kalff; Christian Ewald
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Are pedicle screw perforation rates influenced by registered or unregistered vertebrae in multilevel registration using a CT-based navigation system in the setting of scoliosis?

Authors:  Masayuki Shimizu; Jun Takahashi; Shota Ikegami; Shugo Kuraishi; Toshimasa Futatsugi; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed A Aoude; Maryse Fortin; Rainer Figueiredo; Peter Jarzem; Jean Ouellet; Michael H Weber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine without the use of fluoroscopy or image guidance. Is it safe?

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Nicolas Theumann; Victor Kosmopoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison of three imaging and navigation systems regarding accuracy of pedicle screw placement in a sawbone model.

Authors:  Nils Beisemann; Jula Gierse; Eric Mandelka; Frank Hassel; Paul A Grützner; Jochen Franke; Sven Y Vetter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  The accuracy of multi-slice three-dimensional computerized tomography on the verification of the pedicle screw trajectory.

Authors:  Suat E Celik; Bilal Kelten; Recai Gökcan; Ahmet Cevri Yildiz
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2009-10-10

8.  Predictors of Complications and Unfavorable Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Treatment in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spine Pathologies (Case Series).

Authors:  Vladimir Klimov; Aleksey Evsyukov; Evgeniya Amelina; Sergey Ryabykh; Alexander Simonovich
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-26

9.  Comparison of Three-Dimensional Fluoroscopy versus Postoperative Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Accurate Screw Placement after Instrumented Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sarah T Garber; Erica F Bisson; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-06

10.  Position and complications of pedicle screw insertion with or without image-navigation techniques in the thoracolumbar spine: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Jinshan Tang; Ziqiang Zhu; Tao Sui; Dechao Kong; Xiaojian Cao
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2014-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.