Literature DB >> 22986896

Inter-individual variance and cardiac cycle dependency of aortic root dimensions and shape as assessed by ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomography in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is it crucial for correct sizing?

Lukas Lehmkuhl1, Borek Foldyna, Konstantin Von Aspern, Christian Lücke, Matthias Grothoff, Stefan Nitzsche, Jörg Kempfert, Martin Haensig, Ardawan Rastan, Thomas Walther, Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr, Matthias Gutberlet.   

Abstract

To evaluate the inter-individual variance and the variability of the aortic root dimensions during the cardiac cycle by computed tomography (CT) in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Fifty-six patients (m/w = 16/40, 81 ± 6.8 years), scheduled for a transapical aortic valve implantation with available preprocedural ECG-gated CT were retrospectively included. The evaluation included sizing of the aortic annulus and the aortic sinus, measurements of the coronary topography, aortic valve planimetry and scoring of calcification. The new defined aortic annulus sphericity ratio revealed a mostly elliptical shape with increasing diastolic deformation. The calculated effective diameter (ED), determined from the annulus' lumen area, turned out to be the parameter least affected from cardiac cycle changes while systolic and diastolic annulus dimensions and shape (diameter and area) differed significantly (p < 0.001). In about 70 % of the patients with relevant paravalvular leaks the finally implanted prosthesis was too small according to the CT based calculated ED. The ostial height of the coronaries showed a high variability with a critical minimum range <5 mm. The degree of the aortic calcification did not have an influence on the aortic annulus deformation during the cardiac cycle, but on the occurrence of paravalvular leaks. The aortic root anatomy demonstrated a high inter-individual variability and cardiac cycle dependency. These results must be strongly considered during the patient evaluation prior to TAVI to avoid complications. The systolic effective diameter, as measured by ECG-gated CT, represents an appropriate parameter for sizing the aortic annulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986896      PMCID: PMC3608865          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0123-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  18 in total

1.  Aortic annulus evaluation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Andrea Hutter; Anke Opitz; Sabine Bleiziffer; Hendrik Ruge; Ina Hettich; Domenico Mazzitelli; Albrecht Will; Peter Tassani; Robert Bauernschmitt; Ruediger Lange
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: key steps to assess procedural feasibility.

Authors:  Victoria Delgado; See Hooi Ewe; Arnold C T Ng; Frank van der Kley; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Joanne D Schuijf; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.534

3.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.

Authors:  Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function.

Authors:  Victoria Delgado; Arnold C T Ng; Nico R van de Veire; Frank van der Kley; Joanne D Schuijf; Laurens F Tops; Arend de Weger; Giuseppe Tavilla; Albert de Roos; Lucia J Kroft; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve.

Authors:  Nicoló Piazza; Peter de Jaegere; Carl Schultz; Anton E Becker; Patrick W Serruys; Robert H Anderson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.546

6.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Anatomy of the aortic root with particular emphasis on options for its surgical enlargement.

Authors:  R H Anderson; M Lal; S Y Ho
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  1996-11

8.  Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study.

Authors:  Eberhard Grube; Jean C Laborde; Ulrich Gerckens; Thomas Felderhoff; Barthel Sauren; Lutz Buellesfeld; Ralf Mueller; Maurizio Menichelli; Thomas Schmidt; Bernfried Zickmann; Stein Iversen; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Imaging decision-making for transfemoral or transapical approach of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Gerrit Kaleschke; Harald Seifarth; Gregor Kerckhoff; Holger Reinecke; Helmut Baumgartner
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.534

10.  Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  David A Wood; Laurens F Tops; John R Mayo; Sanjeevan Pasupati; Martin J Schalij; Karin Humphries; May Lee; Abdullah Al Ali; Brad Munt; Rob Moss; Christopher R Thompson; Jeroen J Bax; John G Webb
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  19 in total

1.  Cyclic changes in area- and perimeter-derived effective dimensions of the aortic annulus measured with multislice computed tomography and comparison with metric intraoperative sizing.

Authors:  Won-Keun Kim; Alexander Meyer; Helge Möllmann; Andreas Rolf; Susanne Möllmann; Johannes Blumenstein; Arnaud Van Linden; Christian W Hamm; Thomas Walther; Jörg Kempfert
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  [Imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation].

Authors:  M Gutberlet; B Foldyna; M Grothoff; C Lücke; F Riese; S Nitzsche; M Haensig; K von Aspern; D Holzhey; H Thiele; G Schuler; A Linke; F-W Mohr; L Lehmkuhl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  CT evaluation prior to transapical aortic valve replacement: semi-automatic versus manual image segmentation.

Authors:  Borek Foldyna; Camelia Jungert; Christian Luecke; Konstantin von Aspern; Sonja Boehmer-Lasthaus; Eva Maria Rueth; Matthias Grothoff; Stefan Nitzsche; Matthias Gutberlet; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr; Lukas Lehmkuhl
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Anatomy of the aortic root: implications for aortic root reconstruction.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-27

Review 5.  Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Comparison of aortic root dimension changes during cardiac cycle between the patients with and without aortic valve calcification using ECG-gated 64-slice and dual-source 256-slice computed tomography scanners: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Abbas Arjmand Shabestari; Ramin Pourghorban; Mahmood Tehrai; Hamidreza Pouraliakbar; Taraneh Faghihi Langroudi; Hooman Bakhshandeh; Seifollah Abdi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Novel single-source high-pitch protocol for CT angiography of the aorta: comparison to high-pitch dual-source protocol in the context of TAVI planning.

Authors:  Bernhard Bischoff; Felix G Meinel; Maximilian Reiser; Hans-Christoph Becker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Angiography in the Pre-Procedural Assessment of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Cihan Duran; Irfan Masood; Alper Duran; Luba Frank; Arsalan Saleem; Raja Muthupillai; Benjamin Y C Cheong
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2020-02

9.  Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation.

Authors:  K von Aspern; B Foldyna; C D Etz; A Hoyer; F Girrbach; D Holzhey; C Lücke; M Grothoff; A Linke; F W Mohr; M Gutberlet; L Lehmkuhl
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Vascular Imaging Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Why and How?

Authors:  Damiano Caruso; Russell D Rosenberg; Carlo N De Cecco; Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; Akos Varga-Szemes; Daniel H Steinberg; Andrea Laghi; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.