Literature DB >> 17015786

Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study.

Eberhard Grube1, Jean C Laborde, Ulrich Gerckens, Thomas Felderhoff, Barthel Sauren, Lutz Buellesfeld, Ralf Mueller, Maurizio Menichelli, Thomas Schmidt, Bernfried Zickmann, Stein Iversen, Gregg W Stone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality of surgical aortic valve replacement are increased in elderly patients with multiple high-risk comorbid conditions. Therefore, a prospective, single-center, nonrandomized study was performed in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease to evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous implantation of a novel self-expanding aortic valve bioprosthesis (CoreValve). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Symptomatic high-risk patients with an aortic valve area <1 cm2 were considered for enrollment. CoreValve implantation was performed under general anesthesia with extracorporeal support using the retrograde approach. Clinical follow-up and transthoracic echocardiography were performed after the procedure and at days 15 and 30 after device implantation to evaluate short-term patient and device outcomes. A total of 25 patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient before implantation, 44.2+/-10.8 mm Hg) and multiple comorbidities (median logistic EuroScore, 11.0%) were enrolled. Device success and procedural success were achieved in 22 (88%) and 21 (84%) patients, respectively. Successful device implantation resulted in a marked reduction in the aortic valve gradients (mean gradient after implantation, 12.4+/-3.0 mm Hg; P<0.0001). The mean aortic regurgitation grade was unchanged. Major in-hospital cardiovascular and cerebral events occurred in 8 patients (32%), including mortality in 5 patients (20%). Among 18 patients with device success surviving to discharge, no adverse events occurred within 30 days after leaving the hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous implantation of the self-expanding CoreValve aortic valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis with or without aortic regurgitation is feasible and, when successful, results in marked hemodynamic and clinical improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17015786     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.639450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  96 in total

1.  Impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on pulmonary hyper-tension and clinical outcome in patients with severe aortic valvular stenosis.

Authors:  Dimitry Schewel; Jury Schewel; Julia Martin; Lisa Voigtländer; Christian Frerker; Peter Wohlmuth; Thomas Thielsen; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Which strategy for a protein crystallization project?

Authors:  C E Kundrot
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  [Transcatheter aortic valve implantation : what do anesthetists need to know?].

Authors:  C Riediger; F Nietlispach; F Rüter; J Fassl
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Current developments in transcatheter aortic valve implantation techniques.

Authors:  M Thielmann; P Kahlert; T Konorza; R Erbel; H Jakob; D Wendt
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  There are two sides to everything: two case reports on sequelae of rescue interventions to treat complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis.

Authors:  Ralf Zahn; Rudolf Schiele; Caroline Kilkowski; Bärbel Klein; Uwe Zeymer; Christiane Werling; Andreas Lehmann; Günter Layer; Werner Saggau
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve aortic valve prosthesis in patients at high risk or rejected for surgical valve replacement: Clinical evaluation and feasibility of the procedure in the first 30 patients in the AMC-UvA.

Authors:  J Baan; Z Y Yong; K T Koch; J P S Henriques; B J Bouma; S G de Hert; J van der Meulen; J G P Tijssen; J J Piek; B A J M de Mol
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  The impact of biventricular heart failure on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Tobias Schmidt; Mintje Bohné; Michael Schlüter; Mitsunobu Kitamura; Peter Wohlmuth; Dimitry Schewel; Jury Schewel; Michael Schmoeckel; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Christian Frerker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score predicts hospital charges and resource use after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Timothy J George; Diane E Alejo; Christian A Merlo; William A Baumgartner; Duke E Cameron; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Transapical aortic valve replacement under real-time magnetic resonance imaging guidance: experimental results with balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents.

Authors:  Keith A Horvath; Dumitru Mazilu; Ozgur Kocaturk; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 10.  Considerations in antithrombotic therapy among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Donald R Lynch; David Dantzler; Mark Robbins; David Zhao
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.