PURPOSE: Combining x-ray fluoroscopy and MR imaging systems for guidance of interventional procedures has become more commonplace. By designing an x-ray tube that is immune to the magnetic fields outside of the MR bore, the two systems can be placed in close proximity to each other. A major obstacle to robust x-ray tube design is correcting for the effects of the magnetic fields on the x-ray tube focal spot. A potential solution is to design active shielding that locally cancels the magnetic fields near the focal spot. METHODS: An iterative optimization algorithm is implemented to design resistive active shielding coils that will be placed outside the x-ray tube insert. The optimization procedure attempts to minimize the power consumption of the shielding coils while satisfying magnetic field homogeneity constraints. The algorithm is composed of a linear programming step and a nonlinear programming step that are interleaved with each other. The coil results are verified using a finite element space charge simulation of the electron beam inside the x-ray tube. To alleviate heating concerns an optimized coil solution is derived that includes a neodymium permanent magnet. Any demagnetization of the permanent magnet is calculated prior to solving for the optimized coils. The temperature dynamics of the coil solutions are calculated using a lumped parameter model, which is used to estimate operation times of the coils before temperature failure. RESULTS: For a magnetic field strength of 88 mT, the algorithm solves for coils that consume 588 A∕cm(2). This specific coil geometry can operate for 15 min continuously before reaching temperature failure. By including a neodymium magnet in the design the current density drops to 337 A∕cm(2), which increases the operation time to 59 min. Space charge simulations verify that the coil designs are effective, but for oblique x-ray tube geometries there is still distortion of the focal spot shape along with deflections of approximately 3 mm in the radial and circumferential directions on the anode. CONCLUSIONS: Active shielding is an attractive solution for correcting the effects of magnetic fields on the x-ray focal spot. If extremely long fluoroscopic exposure times are required, longer operation times can be achieved by including a permanent magnet with the active shielding design.
PURPOSE: Combining x-ray fluoroscopy and MR imaging systems for guidance of interventional procedures has become more commonplace. By designing an x-ray tube that is immune to the magnetic fields outside of the MR bore, the two systems can be placed in close proximity to each other. A major obstacle to robust x-ray tube design is correcting for the effects of the magnetic fields on the x-ray tube focal spot. A potential solution is to design active shielding that locally cancels the magnetic fields near the focal spot. METHODS: An iterative optimization algorithm is implemented to design resistive active shielding coils that will be placed outside the x-ray tube insert. The optimization procedure attempts to minimize the power consumption of the shielding coils while satisfying magnetic field homogeneity constraints. The algorithm is composed of a linear programming step and a nonlinear programming step that are interleaved with each other. The coil results are verified using a finite element space charge simulation of the electron beam inside the x-ray tube. To alleviate heating concerns an optimized coil solution is derived that includes a neodymium permanent magnet. Any demagnetization of the permanent magnet is calculated prior to solving for the optimized coils. The temperature dynamics of the coil solutions are calculated using a lumped parameter model, which is used to estimate operation times of the coils before temperature failure. RESULTS: For a magnetic field strength of 88 mT, the algorithm solves for coils that consume 588 A∕cm(2). This specific coil geometry can operate for 15 min continuously before reaching temperature failure. By including a neodymium magnet in the design the current density drops to 337 A∕cm(2), which increases the operation time to 59 min. Space charge simulations verify that the coil designs are effective, but for oblique x-ray tube geometries there is still distortion of the focal spot shape along with deflections of approximately 3 mm in the radial and circumferential directions on the anode. CONCLUSIONS: Active shielding is an attractive solution for correcting the effects of magnetic fields on the x-ray focal spot. If extremely long fluoroscopic exposure times are required, longer operation times can be achieved by including a permanent magnet with the active shielding design.
Authors: R Fahrig; K Butts; Z Wen; R Saunders; S T Kee; D Y Sze; B L Daniel; F Laerum; N J Pelc Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: R Fahrig; K Butts; J A Rowlands; R Saunders; J Stanton; G M Stevens; B L Daniel; Z Wen; D L Ergun; N J Pelc Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Stephen T Kee; Arundhuti Ganguly; Bruce L Daniel; Zhifei Wen; Kim Butts; Anne Shimikawa; Norbert J Pelc; Rebecca Fahrig; Michael D Dake Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: John A Bracken; Giovanni DeCrescenzo; Philip Komljenovic; Prasheel V Lillaney; Rebecca Fahrig; J A Rowlands Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Mark W Wilson; Nicholas Fidelman; Oliver M Weber; Alastair J Martin; Roy L Gordon; Jeanne M LaBerge; Robert K Kerlan; Kristen A Wolanske; Maythem Saeed Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Kawal S Rhode; Derek L G Hill; Philip J Edwards; John Hipwell; Daniel Rueckert; Gerardo Sanchez-Ortiz; Sanjeet Hegde; Vithuran Rahunathan; Reza Razavi Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 10.048