Literature DB >> 22948528

Acetabular cup design influences deformational response in total hip arthroplasty.

John B Meding1, Scott R Small, Mary E Jones, Michael E Berend, Merrill A Ritter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Press-fit acetabular components are susceptible to deformation in an underreamed socket, with excessive deformation of metal-on-metal (MOM) components potentially leading to increased torsional friction and micromotion. Specifically, however, it remains unclear how cup diameter, design, and time from implantation affect shell deformation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) changes in component geometry and material altered maximum shell deformation and (2) time-dependent deformational relaxation processes occurred.
METHODS: Diametral deformation was quantified after press-fit implantation of metal shells into a previously validated polyurethane model. Experimental groups (n = 6-8) consisted of 48-, 54-, 60-, and 66-mm MOM cups of 6-mm wall thickness, 58-mm cups of 10-mm wall thickness, and CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V 58-mm modular cups.
RESULTS: Greater cup diameter, thinner wall construction, and Ti6Al4V modular designs generated conditions for maximum shell deformation ranging from 0.047 to 0.267 mm. Relaxation (18%-32%) was observed 120 hours postimplantation in thin-walled and modular designs.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate a reduction of shell deformation over time and suggest, under physiologic loading, early component deformation varies with design. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Component deformation should be a design consideration regardless of bearing surface. Designs neglecting to adequately address deformational changes in vivo could be susceptible to diminished cup survival, increased wear, and premature revision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22948528      PMCID: PMC3549190          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2553-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  Low incidence of groin pain and early failure with large metal articulation total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John B Meding; Lindsey K Meding; E Michael Keating; Michael E Berend
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: design.

Authors:  Duncan Dowson; Cath Hardaker; Magnus Flett; Graham H Isaac
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John M Cuckler; K David Moore; Adolph V Lombardi; Edward McPherson; Roger Emerson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Influence of the clearance on in-vitro tribology of large diameter metal-on-metal articulations pertaining to resurfacing hip implants.

Authors:  Claude B Rieker; Rolf Schön; Reto Konrad; Gernot Liebentritt; Patric Gnepf; Ming Shen; Paul Roberts; Peter Grigoris
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 1: Experimental simulation.

Authors:  Z M Lin; S Meakins; M M Morlock; P Parsons; C Hardaker; M Flett; G Isaac
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

6.  Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 2: Finite element simulation.

Authors:  A Yew; Z M Jin; A Donn; M M Morlock; G Isaac
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  Acetabular component deformation with press-fit fixation.

Authors:  Matthew Squire; William L Griffin; J Bohannon Mason; Richard D Peindl; Susan Odum
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use.

Authors:  H McKellop; S H Park; R Chiesa; P Doorn; B Lu; P Normand; P Grigoris; H Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty with large heads may prevent early dislocation.

Authors:  Thomas M Smith; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Roger H Emerson; Thomas H Mallory
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  In vivo comparison of hip separation after metal-on-metal or metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard D Komistek; Douglas A Dennis; Jorge A Ochoa; Brian D Haas; Curt Hammill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Baseplate Stability in Superior Bone Loss With Augmented Implant.

Authors:  Elise J Martin; Thomas R Duquin; Mark T Ehrensberger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2021-06-13

2.  Impaction technique influences implant stability in low-density bone model.

Authors:  Ruben Doyle; Richard J van Arkel; Sarah Muirhead-Allwood; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  Effect of impaction energy on dynamic bone strains, fixation strength, and seating of cementless acetabular cups.

Authors:  Ruben Doyle; Richard J van Arkel; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Titanium Acetabular Component Deformation under Cyclic Loading.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Rudi G Bitsch; Theresa Bormann; Steffen Braun; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.