Literature DB >> 15578551

Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

John M Cuckler1, K David Moore, Adolph V Lombardi, Edward McPherson, Roger Emerson.   

Abstract

The recent resurgence of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty has afforded the surgeon new options in femoral head diameters that were not previously available. Reduction in the risk for dislocation and potential improvements in articular wear are the obvious advantages of large-diameter femoral heads. Total hips with larger-diameter femoral heads are more resistant to dislocation. The clinical experience with 616 38 mm diameter femoral heads showed no dislocations within the first 3 months after surgery, compared with 2.5% of 78 patients receiving 28 mm diameter femoral heads with otherwise identical components. Use of larger-diameter femoral heads appears to have the potential to substantially reduce the early risk of dislocation of the prosthetic hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15578551     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  40 in total

1.  Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Low incidence of groin pain and early failure with large metal articulation total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John B Meding; Lindsey K Meding; E Michael Keating; Michael E Berend
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  In vitro Wear Rate and Co Ion Release of Compositionally and Structurally Graded CoCrMo-Ti6Al4V Structures.

Authors:  Stanley Dittrick; Vamsi Krishna Balla; Susmita Bose; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 7.328

4.  Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Michael D Skeels; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Orlando J Franchi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Wataru Ando; Kengo Yamamoto; Takashi Atsumi; Satoshi Tamaoki; Kazuhiro Oinuma; Hideaki Shiratsuchi; Hirohiko Tokunaga; Yutaka Inaba; Naomi Kobayashi; Masaharu Aihara; Kenji Ohzono
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-10

6.  Six sigma analysis of minimally invasive acetabular arthroplasty: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  David A Heck; James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Ideal femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty balances stability and volumetric wear.

Authors:  Michael B Cross; Denis Nam; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-13

8.  Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing decreases the cumulative long-term risk of dislocation.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Yasuhiro Homma; Olivier Pidet; Isaac Guissou; Jacques Hernigou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The natural history of inflammatory pseudotumors in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sulaiman A Almousa; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Keri L Satterwhite
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.