Literature DB >> 16669396

Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 1: Experimental simulation.

Z M Lin1, S Meakins, M M Morlock, P Parsons, C Hardaker, M Flett, G Isaac.   

Abstract

The interference press fit of a metallic one-piece acetabular cup employed for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing procedures was investigated experimentally under laboratory conditions in the present study, in particular regarding the cup deformation. Tests were carried out in cadavers as well as polyurethane foams of various grades with different elastic moduli to represent different cancellous bone qualities. The cadaver test was used to establish the most suitable configuration of the foam model representing realistic support and geometrical conditions at the pelvis. It was found that a spherical cavity, with two identical areas relieved on opposite sides, was capable of creating a two-point pinching action of the ischeal and ilial columns on the cup as the worst-case scenario. Furthermore, the cup deformation produced from such a two-point loading model with a grade 30 foam was similar to that measured from the cadaver test. Therefore, such a protocol was employed in subsequent experimental tests. For a given size of the outside diameter of the cup of 60 mm, the cup deflection was shown to be dependent largely on the cup wall thickness and the diametral interference between cup and prepared cavity at implantation. For a relatively thin cup with a wall thickness between 2.3 mm (equator) and 4 mm (pole) and with a modest nominal diametral interference of 1 mm, which corresponds to an actual interference of approximately 0.5 mm, the maximum diametral cup deflection (at the rim) was around 60 microm, compared with a diametral clearance of 80-120 microm between the femoral head and the acetabular cup, generally required for fluid-film lubrication and tribological performances. Stiffening of the cup, by both thickening and lateralizing by 1 mm, reduced the cup deformation to between 30 and 50 microm with actual diametral interferences between 0.5 and 1 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16669396     DOI: 10.1243/095441105X69150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  10 in total

1.  Deformation of metal-backed acetabular components and the impact of liner thickness in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  David Markel; Judd Day; Ryan Siskey; Imants Liepins; Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Ten different hip resurfacing systems: biomechanical analysis of design and material properties.

Authors:  Christian Heisel; Jennifer A Kleinhans; Michael Menge; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Finite element model of the impaction of a press-fitted acetabular cup.

Authors:  Adrien Michel; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Romain Bosc; Romain Vayron; Philippe Hernigou; Salah Naili; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  A hierarchy of computationally derived surgical and patient influences on metal on metal press-fit acetabular cup failure.

Authors:  S G Clarke; A T M Phillips; A M J Bull; J P Cobb
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Acetabular cup design influences deformational response in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John B Meding; Scott R Small; Mary E Jones; Michael E Berend; Merrill A Ritter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Deformation of the Durom acetabular component and its impact on tribology in a cadaveric model--a simulator study.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Zhefeng Chen; Yanqing Gu; Qing Wang; Weiding Cui; Weimin Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Dani Gaillard-Campbell; Thomas P Gross
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-11-01

8.  Impaction technique influences implant stability in low-density bone model.

Authors:  Ruben Doyle; Richard J van Arkel; Sarah Muirhead-Allwood; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Effect of impaction energy on dynamic bone strains, fixation strength, and seating of cementless acetabular cups.

Authors:  Ruben Doyle; Richard J van Arkel; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Titanium Acetabular Component Deformation under Cyclic Loading.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Rudi G Bitsch; Theresa Bormann; Steffen Braun; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.