Literature DB >> 22929383

Direct 4-D PET list mode parametric reconstruction with a novel EM algorithm.

Jianhua Yan1, Beata Planeta-Wilson, Richard E Carson.   

Abstract

The production of images of kinetic parameters is often the ultimate goal of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. The indirect method of PET parametric imaging, also called the frame-based method (FM), is performed by fitting the time-activity curve (TAC) for each voxel with an appropriate compartment model after image reconstruction. The indirect method is simple and easily implemented, however, it usually leads to some loss of accuracy or precision, due to the use of two separate steps. This paper presents a direct 4-D method for producing 3-D images of kinetic parameters from list mode PET data. In this application, the TAC for each voxel is described by a one-tissue compartment model (1T). Extending previous EM algorithms, a new spatiotemporal complete data space was introduced to optimize the maximum likelihood function. This leads to a straightforward closed-form parametric image update equation. This method was implemented by extending the current list mode platform MOLAR to produce a parametric algorithm PMOLAR-1T. Using an ordered subset approach, qualitative and quantitative evaluations were performed using 2-D (x, t) and 4-D (x, y, z, t) simulated list mode data based on brain receptor tracers and also with a human brain study. Comparisons with the indirect method showed that the proposed direct method can lead to accurate estimation of the parametric image values with reduced variance, especially at low count levels. In the 2-D test, the direct method showed similar bias to the frame-based method but with variance reduction of 23%-60%. In the 4-D test, bias values of both methods were no more than 4% and the direct method had lower variability (coefficient of variation reduction of 0%-64% compared to the frame-based method) at the normal count level. The direct method had a larger reduction in variability (27%-81%) and lower bias (1%-5% for 4-D and 1%-19% for FM) at low count levels. The results in the human brain study are similar with PMOLAR-1T showing lower noise than FM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22929383      PMCID: PMC3660152          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2212451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  22 in total

1.  Regularization for uniform spatial resolution properties in penalized-likelihood image reconstruction.

Authors:  J W Stayman; J A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Spatiotemporal reconstruction of list-mode PET data.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols; Jinyi Qi; Evren Asma; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Accuracy of Head Motion Compensation for the HRRT: Comparison of Methods.

Authors:  Xiao Jin; Tim Mulnix; Beata Planeta-Wilson; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Richard E Carson
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2009-10-24

4.  Joint estimation of dynamic PET images and temporal basis functions using fully 4D ML-EM.

Authors:  Andrew J Reader; Florent C Sureau; Claude Comtat; Régine Trébossen; Irène Buvat
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands.

Authors:  Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography.

Authors:  L A Shepp; Y Vardi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Study of direct and indirect parametric estimation methods of linear models in dynamic positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Charalampos Tsoumpas; Federico E Turkheimer; Kris Thielemans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies.

Authors:  A A Lammertsma; S P Hume
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography.

Authors:  K Lange; R Carson
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Kinetic modeling of the serotonin 5-HT(1B) receptor radioligand [(11)C]P943 in humans.

Authors:  Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Nabeel Nabulsi; Alexander Neumeister; Beata Planeta-Wilson; Wendol A Williams; Tarun Singhal; Sunhee Kim; R Paul Maguire; Timothy McCarthy; J James Frost; Yiyun Huang; Yu-Shin Ding; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.200

View more
  12 in total

1.  Direct reconstruction of cardiac PET kinetic parametric images using a preconditioned conjugate gradient approach.

Authors:  Yothin Rakvongthai; Jinsong Ouyang; Bastien Guerin; Quanzheng Li; Nathaniel M Alpert; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Direct reconstruction of parametric images for brain PET with event-by-event motion correction: evaluation in two tracers across count levels.

Authors:  Mary Germino; Jean-Dominque Gallezot; Jianhua Yan; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Advances in PET/MR instrumentation and image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Cardiac-gated parametric images from 82 Rb PET from dynamic frames and direct 4D reconstruction.

Authors:  Mary Germino; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Nicolas Karakatsanis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Direct parametric reconstruction in dynamic PET myocardial perfusion imaging: in vivo studies.

Authors:  Yoann Petibon; Yothin Rakvongthai; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Direct Patlak Reconstruction From Dynamic PET Data Using the Kernel Method With MRI Information Based on Structural Similarity.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Jinxiu Cheng-Liao; Guobao Wang; Kevin T Chen; Ciprian Catana; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Whole-body direct 4D parametric PET imaging employing nested generalized Patlak expectation-maximization reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Michael E Casey; Martin A Lodge; Arman Rahmim; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Total-Body Dynamic Reconstruction and Parametric Imaging on the uEXPLORER.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Zhaoheng Xie; Eric Berg; Martin S Judenhofer; Weiping Liu; Tianyi Xu; Yu Ding; Yang Lv; Yun Dong; Zilin Deng; Songsong Tang; Hongcheng Shi; Pengcheng Hu; Shuguang Chen; Jun Bao; Hongdi Li; Jian Zhou; Guobao Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Direct List Mode Parametric Reconstruction for Dynamic Cardiac SPECT.

Authors:  Luyao Shi; Yihuan Lu; Jing Wu; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Nabil Boutagy; Stephanie Thorn; Albert J Sinusas; Richard E Carson; Chi Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.