Literature DB >> 28379843

Direct parametric reconstruction in dynamic PET myocardial perfusion imaging: in vivo studies.

Yoann Petibon1, Yothin Rakvongthai, Georges El Fakhri, Jinsong Ouyang.   

Abstract

Dynamic PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) used in conjunction with tracer kinetic modeling enables the quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF). However, MBF maps computed using the traditional indirect method (i.e. post-reconstruction voxel-wise fitting of kinetic model to PET time-activity-curves-TACs) suffer from poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameters from raw PET projection data has been shown to offer parametric images with higher SNR compared to the indirect method. The aim of this study was to extend and evaluate the performance of a direct parametric reconstruction method using in vivo dynamic PET MPI data for the purpose of quantifying MBF. Dynamic PET MPI studies were performed on two healthy pigs using a Siemens Biograph mMR scanner. List-mode PET data for each animal were acquired following a bolus injection of ~7-8 mCi of 18F-flurpiridaz, a myocardial perfusion agent. Fully-3D dynamic PET sinograms were obtained by sorting the coincidence events into 16 temporal frames covering ~5 min after radiotracer administration. Additionally, eight independent noise realizations of both scans-each containing 1/8th of the total number of events-were generated from the original list-mode data. Dynamic sinograms were then used to compute parametric maps using the conventional indirect method and the proposed direct method. For both methods, a one-tissue compartment model accounting for spillover from the left and right ventricle blood-pools was used to describe the kinetics of 18F-flurpiridaz. An image-derived arterial input function obtained from a TAC taken in the left ventricle cavity was used for tracer kinetic analysis. For the indirect method, frame-by-frame images were estimated using two fully-3D reconstruction techniques: the standard ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction algorithm on one side, and the one-step late maximum a posteriori (OSL-MAP) algorithm on the other side, which incorporates a quadratic penalty function. The parametric images were then calculated using voxel-wise weighted least-square fitting of the reconstructed myocardial PET TACs. For the direct method, parametric images were estimated directly from the dynamic PET sinograms using a maximum a posteriori (MAP) parametric reconstruction algorithm which optimizes an objective function comprised of the Poisson log-likelihood term, the kinetic model and a quadratic penalty function. Maximization of the objective function with respect to each set of parameters was achieved using a preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm with a specifically developed pre-conditioner. The performance of the direct method was evaluated by comparing voxel- and segment-wise estimates of [Formula: see text], the tracer transport rate (ml · min-1 · ml-1), to those obtained using the indirect method applied to both OSEM and OSL-MAP dynamic reconstructions. The proposed direct reconstruction method produced [Formula: see text] maps with visibly lower noise than the indirect method based on OSEM and OSL-MAP reconstructions. At normal count levels, the direct method was shown to outperform the indirect method based on OSL-MAP in the sense that at matched level of bias, reduced regional noise levels were obtained. At lower count levels, the direct method produced [Formula: see text] estimates with significantly lower standard deviation across noise realizations than the indirect method based on OSL-MAP at matched bias level. In all cases, the direct method yielded lower noise and standard deviation than the indirect method based on OSEM. Overall, the proposed direct reconstruction offered a better bias-variance tradeoff than the indirect method applied to either OSEM and OSL-MAP. Direct parametric reconstruction as applied to in vivo dynamic PET MPI data is therefore a promising method for producing MBF maps with lower variance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28379843      PMCID: PMC5739089          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  48 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.

Authors:  R Boellaard; A van Lingen; A A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve: Technical aspects.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  A novel approach for direct reconstruction of parametric images for myocardial blood flow from PET imaging.

Authors:  Kuan-Hao Su; Tzu-Chen Yen; Yu-Hua Dean Fang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Four-dimensional (4D) image reconstruction strategies in dynamic PET: beyond conventional independent frame reconstruction.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jing Tang; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Three-dimensional correction for spillover and recovery of myocardial PET images.

Authors:  H Nuyts; A Maes; M Vrolix; C Schiepers; H Schelbert; W Kuhle; G Bormans; G Poppe; D Buxton; P Suetens; H De Geest; L Mortelmans
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Direct 4D PET MLEM reconstruction of parametric images using the simplified reference tissue model with the basis function method for [¹¹C]raclopride.

Authors:  Paul Gravel; Andrew J Reader
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Joint parametric reconstruction and motion correction framework for dynamic PET data.

Authors:  Jieqing Jiao; Alexandre Bousse; Kris Thielemans; Pawel Markiewicz; Ninon Burgos; David Atkinson; Simon Arridge; Brian F Hutton; Sébastien Ourselin
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

9.  Single-scan rest∕stress imaging (18)F-labeled flow tracers.

Authors:  Nathaniel Alpert; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Cardiac motion compensation and resolution modeling in simultaneous PET-MR: a cardiac lesion detection study.

Authors:  Y Petibon; J Ouyang; X Zhu; C Huang; T G Reese; S Y Chun; Q Li; G El Fakhri
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Stress CMR in Known or Suspected CAD: Diagnostic and Prognostic Role.

Authors:  Francesca Baessato; Marco Guglielmo; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Andrea Baggiano; Laura Fusini; Stefano Scafuri; Mario Babbaro; Rocco Mollace; Ada Collevecchio; Andrea I Guaricci; Gianluca Pontone
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Clinical quantitative cardiac imaging for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Maria Siebes; Marc Kachelrieß; Klaus F Kofoed; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Konstantin Nikolaou; Wenjia Bai; Andreas Kofler; Robert Manka; Sebastian Kozerke; Amedeo Chiribiri; Tobias Schaeffter; Florian Michallek; Frank Bengel; Stephan Nekolla; Paul Knaapen; Mark Lubberink; Roxy Senior; Meng-Xing Tang; Jan J Piek; Tim van de Hoef; Johannes Martens; Laura Schreiber
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Recent methodology advances in fluorescence molecular tomography.

Authors:  Yu An; Kun Wang; Jie Tian
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2018-09-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.