Literature DB >> 22926999

A configural theory of attention and associative learning.

David N George1, John M Pearce.   

Abstract

A formal account of the relationship between attention and associative learning is presented within the framework of a configural theory of discrimination learning. The account is based on a connectionist network in which the entire pattern of stimulation presented on a trial activates a configural unit that then enters into an association with the trial outcome. Attention is assumed to have two roles within this network. First, the salience of the stimuli at the input to the network can be increased if they are relevant to the occurrence of reinforcement and decreased if they are irrelevant. Second, the associability of configural units can increase on trials when the outcome is surprising and decrease when the outcome is not surprising.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926999     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-012-0078-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  20 in total

1.  Associative changes in excitors and inhibitors differ when they are conditioned in compound.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-10

2.  Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning.

Authors:  John M Pearce
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

3.  Latent inhibition: the effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditional stimulus.

Authors:  R E LUBOW; A U MOORE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-08

4.  Conditions favoring superconditioning of irrelevant conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas A Williams; Rick Mehta; Jamie-Lynne Dumont
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-04

5.  Two kinds of attention in Pavlovian conditioning: evidence for a hybrid model of learning.

Authors:  Mark Haselgrove; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce; Peter M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-10

6.  Stimuli that signal the absence of reinforcement are paid more attention than are irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Jemma C Dopson; Natalie A Williams; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Changes in attention to an irrelevant cue that accompanies a negative patterning [corrected] discrimination.

Authors:  Jemma C Dopson; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  The orienting response as an index of stimulus associability in rats.

Authors:  J A Swan; J M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-07

9.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Similarity and discrimination in human Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Annette Kinder; Harald Lachnit
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  14 in total

1.  Testing analogical rule transfer in pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; F Gregory Ashby; J David Smith; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  The role of category density in pigeons' tracking of relevant information.

Authors:  Cassandra L Sheridan; Leyre Castro; Sol Fonseca; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Feature predictiveness and selective attention in pigeons' categorization learning.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Transfer of absolute and relative predictiveness in human contingency learning.

Authors:  Florian Kattner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Assessing Attention in Category Learning by Animals.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Leyre Castro
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20

6.  Focusing and shifting attention in pigeon category learning.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Ella Remund Wiger; Edward Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.088

7.  Asymmetrical generalization of conditioning and extinction from compound to element and element to compound.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Caleb Doyle-Burr; Drina Vurbic
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-08-27

8.  Pigeons process actor-action configurations more readily than bystander-action configurations.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Modeling attention in associative learning: two processes or one?

Authors:  M E Le Pelley; Mark Haselgrove; Guillem R Esber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  An exploration of the feature-positive effect in adult humans.

Authors:  Anja Lotz; Metin Uengoer; Stephan Koenig; John M Pearce; Harald Lachnit
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.