Literature DB >> 32043271

Pigeons process actor-action configurations more readily than bystander-action configurations.

Muhammad A J Qadri1, Robert G Cook2.   

Abstract

Behavior requires an actor. Two experiments using complex conditional action discriminations examined whether pigeons privilege information related to the digital actor who is engaged in behavior. In Experiment 1, each of two video displays contained a digital model, one an actor engaged in one of two behaviors (Indian dance or martial arts) and one a neutrally posed bystander. To correctly classify the display, the pigeons needed to conditionally process the action in conjunction with distinctive physical features of the actor or the bystander. Four actor-conditional pigeons learned to correctly discriminate the actions based on the identity of the actors, whereas four bystander-conditional birds failed to learn. Experiment 2 established that this failure was not due to the latter group's inability to spatially integrate information across the distance between the two models. Potentially, the colocalization of the relevant model identity and the action was critical due to a fundamental configural or integral representation of these properties. These findings contribute to our understanding of the evolution of action recognition, the recognition of social behavior, and forms of observational learning by animals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action recognition; Actor; Behavior; Pigeon

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32043271      PMCID: PMC7134326          DOI: 10.3758/s13420-020-00416-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  42 in total

1.  Theories of associative learning in animals.

Authors:  J M Pearce; M E Bouton
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning.

Authors:  John M Pearce
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

Review 3.  Avian psychology and communication.

Authors:  Candy Rowe; John Skelhorn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Using robots to understand animal cognition.

Authors:  Anna Frohnwieser; John C Murray; Thomas W Pike; Anna Wilkinson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Spatiotemporal properties of visual stimuli for song induction in Bengalese finches.

Authors:  Miki Takahasi; Maki Ikebuchi; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

7.  Multiple feature use in pigeons' category discrimination: The influence of stimulus set structure and the salience of stimulus differences.

Authors:  Stephen E G Lea; Emmanuel M Pothos; Andy J Wills; Lisa A Leaver; Catriona M E Ryan; Christina Meier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.478

8.  Visual processing in pigeon nucleus rotundus: luminance, color, motion, and looming subdivisions.

Authors:  Y C Wang; S Jiang; B J Frost
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Lauren M Turner; Moria J Smoski; Stacie L Pozdol; Wendy L Stone
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03

10.  Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task.

Authors:  Britta Osthaus; Stephen E G Lea; Alan M Slater
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.