Literature DB >> 30508704

Testing analogical rule transfer in pigeons (Columba livia).

Muhammad A J Qadri1, F Gregory Ashby2, J David Smith3, Robert G Cook4.   

Abstract

Categorization is an essential cognitive process useful for transferring knowledge from previous experience to novel situations. The mechanisms by which trained categorization behavior extends to novel stimuli, especially in animals, are insufficiently understood. To understand how pigeons learn and transfer category membership, seven pigeons were trained to classify controlled, bi-dimensional stimuli in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Following either dimensional, rule-based (RB) or information integration (II) training, tests were conducted focusing on the "analogical" extension of the learned discrimination to novel regions of the stimulus space (Casale, Roeder, & Ashby, 2012). The pigeons' results mirrored those from human and non-human primates evaluated using the same analogical task structure, training and testing: the pigeons transferred their discriminative behavior to the new extended values following RB training, but not after II training. Further experiments evaluating rule-based models and association-based models suggested the pigeons use dimensions and associations to learn the task and mediate transfer to stimuli within the novel region of the parametric stimulus space.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analogical transfer; Categorization; Pigeon; Procedural learning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30508704      PMCID: PMC6322971          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  33 in total

1.  Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1990-11

Review 2.  The attention system of the human brain.

Authors:  M I Posner; S E Petersen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  A configural theory of attention and associative learning.

Authors:  David N George; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Implicit and explicit category learning by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  J David Smith; Michael J Beran; Matthew J Crossley; Joseph Boomer; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

6.  Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization.

Authors:  W T Maddox; F G Ashby
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-01

7.  Pigeons' categorization may be exclusively nonanalytic.

Authors:  J David Smith; F Gregory Ashby; Mark E Berg; Matthew S Murphy; Brian Spiering; Robert G Cook; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

Review 8.  Human category learning.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 9.  Implicit and explicit categorization: a tale of four species.

Authors:  J David Smith; Mark E Berg; Robert G Cook; Matthew S Murphy; Matthew J Crossley; Joseph Boomer; Brian Spiering; Michael J Beran; Barbara A Church; F Gregory Ashby; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Mechanisms underlying speech sound discrimination and categorization in humans and zebra finches.

Authors:  Merel A Burgering; Carel Ten Cate; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  7 in total

1.  Within-session dynamics of categorical and memory mechanisms in pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Muhammad A J Qadri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12-02

2.  The Lords of the Rings: People and pigeons take different paths mastering the concentric-rings categorization task.

Authors:  Ellen M O'Donoghue; Matthew B Broschard; John H Freeman; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-10-04

3.  Pigeons exhibit flexibility but not rule formation in dimensional learning, stimulus generalization, and task switching.

Authors:  Ellen M O'Donoghue; Matthew B Broschard; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Exploring Explicit Learning Strategies: A Dissociative Framework for Research.

Authors:  Barbara A Church; Brooke N Jackson; J David Smith
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2020-08-08

5.  Conceptual anchoring dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.

Authors:  J David Smith; Brooke N Jackson; Markie N Adamczyk; Barbara A Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.140

6.  A Dissociative Framework for Understanding Same-Different Conceptualization.

Authors:  J David Smith; Barbara A Church
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2020-07-15

7.  Pigeons proficiently switch among four tasks without cost.

Authors:  Ellen O'Donoghue; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.478

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.