Literature DB >> 20718552

Two kinds of attention in Pavlovian conditioning: evidence for a hybrid model of learning.

Mark Haselgrove1, Guillem R Esber, John M Pearce, Peter M Jones.   

Abstract

Four appetitive Pavlovian conditioning experiments with rats examined the rate at which the discrimination between compounds AY and AX was solved relative to the discrimination between compounds AY and BY. In Experiments 1 and 2, these discriminations were preceded by training in which A and B were continuously reinforced and X and Y were partially reinforced. Consistent with the Pearce and Hall (1980) model, the results showed that the AY/AX discrimination was solved more readily than the AY/BY discrimination. In Experiments 3 and 4, the discriminations were preceded by feature-positive training in which trials with AX and BY signaled food but trials with X and Y did not. Consistent with the Mackintosh (1975) model, the results showed that the AY/BY discrimination was solved more readily than the AY/AX discrimination. These results are discussed with respect to a hybrid model of conditioning and attention. 2010 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20718552     DOI: 10.1037/a0018528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  25 in total

1.  Reward anticipation and punishment anticipation are instantiated in the brain via opponent mechanisms.

Authors:  Jessica I Lake; Jeffrey M Spielberg; Zachary P Infantolino; Laura D Crocker; Cindy M Yee; Wendy Heller; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Changes in attention to an irrelevant cue that accompanies a negative patterning [corrected] discrimination.

Authors:  Jemma C Dopson; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Reconciling the influence of predictiveness and uncertainty on stimulus salience: a model of attention in associative learning.

Authors:  Guillem R Esber; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Active avoidance requires a serial basal amygdala to nucleus accumbens shell circuit.

Authors:  Franchesca Ramirez; Justin M Moscarello; Joseph E LeDoux; Robert M Sears
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Special issue on computational models of classical conditioning guest editors' introduction.

Authors:  Eduardo Alonso; Nestor Schmajuk
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  A configural theory of attention and associative learning.

Authors:  David N George; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Solving Pavlov's puzzle: attentional, associative, and flexible configural mechanisms in classical conditioning.

Authors:  Munir G Kutlu; Nestor A Schmajuk
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Transfer of absolute and relative predictiveness in human contingency learning.

Authors:  Florian Kattner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Prior beliefs influence symmetrical or asymmetrical generalizations in human causal learning.

Authors:  Ryoji Nishiyama; Takatoshi Nagaishi; Takahisa Masaki
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Risk-responsive orbitofrontal neurons track acquired salience.

Authors:  Masaaki Ogawa; Matthijs A A van der Meer; Guillem R Esber; Domenic H Cerri; Thomas A Stalnaker; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.