Literature DB >> 22918795

Quality and readability of information materials for people with brain tumours and their families.

Danette Langbecker1, Monika Janda.   

Abstract

Written information is commonly used to inform patients about their disease and treatment but must be evidence-based and understandable to be useful. This study assessed the quality of the content and the readability of information brochures for people affected by brain tumours. We randomly selected 18 publicly available brochures. Brochures were assessed by criteria to assess the quality of content using the DISCERN instrument. Readability was tested using three commonly used formulas, which yield the reading grade level required to comprehend the brochure (sixth grade level recommended). The mean overall DISCERN score was 3.17 out of a maximum of 5 (moderate quality); only one achieved a rating greater than 4 (high quality). Only one brochure met the sixth grade readability criteria. Although brochures may have accurate content, few satisfied all of the recommended criteria to evaluate their content. Existing brochures need to be critically reviewed and simplified and consumer-focused brochures, produced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22918795     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-012-0401-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of the readability of ACOG patient education pamphlets. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors:  M C Freda; K Damus; I R Merkatz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Darren A Dewalt; Nancy D Berkman; Stacey Sheridan; Kathleen N Lohr; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Psychosocial and supportive-care needs in high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Susan Catt; Anthony Chalmers; Lesley Fallowfield
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Tools used to evaluate written medicine and health information: document and user perspectives.

Authors:  Alice Luk; Parisa Aslani
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2011-04-13

5.  Communication theory and the search for effective feedback.

Authors:  S K Simonds
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Evaluation of generic patient information: effects on health outcomes, knowledge and satisfaction.

Authors:  Charlotte Sheard; Paul Garrud
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-04

7.  Unsuitable readability levels of patient information pertaining to dementia and related diseases: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Markus Weih; Angelika Reinhold; Tanja Richter-Schmidinger; Anne-Kathrin Sulimma; Harald Klein; Johannes Kornhuber
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 3.878

8.  Improving the usability of patient information leaflets.

Authors:  Henk Pander Maat; Leo Lentz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-10-23

9.  Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices.

Authors:  Charlotte E Rees; Jillyan E Ford; Charlotte E Sheard
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-07

10.  A readability analysis of Australian stroke information.

Authors:  K Sullivan; F O'Conor
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.119

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quality, Readability, and Understandability of German Booklets Addressing Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Julia Brütting; Lydia Reinhardt; Maike Bergmann; Dirk Schadendorf; Christiane Weber; Wolfgang Tilgen; Carola Berking; Friedegund Meier
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Readability of Invasive Procedure Consent Forms.

Authors:  Adam E M Eltorai; Syed S Naqvi; Soha Ghanian; Craig P Eberson; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Christopher T Born; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 3.  Systematic review of interventions to improve the provision of information for adults with primary brain tumors and their caregivers.

Authors:  Danette Langbecker; Monika Janda
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Screening for Psychological Distress in Adult Primary Brain Tumor Patients and Caregivers: Considerations for Cancer Care Coordination.

Authors:  Wafa Trad; Eng-Siew Koh; Maysaa Daher; Alanah Bailey; Marina Kastelan; Dianne Legge; Marcia Fleet; Grahame K Simpson; Elizabeth Hovey
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  An evaluation of healthcare information on the Internet: the case of colorectal cancer prevention.

Authors:  Chia-Ching Chen; Tetsuji Yamada; John Smith
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Clear Communication Index to Brazilian Portuguese.

Authors:  Angélica Maria Cupertino Lopes Marinho; Cynthia Baur; Fernanda Morais Ferreira; Ana Cristina Borges-Oliveira; Mauro Henrique Nogueira Guimarães de Abreu
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.106

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.