OBJECTIVE: To review the relationship between literacy and health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS), Industrial and Labor Relations Review (ILLR), PsychInfo, and Ageline from 1980 to 2003. STUDY SELECTION: We included observational studies that reported original data, measured literacy with any valid instrument, and measured one or more health outcomes. Two abstractors reviewed each study for inclusion and resolved disagreements by discussion. DATA EXTRACTION: One reviewer abstracted data from each article into an evidence table; the second reviewer checked each entry. The whole study team reconciled disagreements about information in evidence tables. Both data extractors independently completed an 11-item quality scale for each article; scores were averaged to give a final measure of article quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: We reviewed 3,015 titles and abstracts and pulled 684 articles for full review; 73 articles met inclusion criteria and, of those, 44 addressed the questions of this report. Patients with low literacy had poorer health outcomes, including knowledge, intermediate disease markers, measures of morbidity, general health status, and use of health resources. Patients with low literacy were generally 1.5 to 3 times more likely to experience a given poor outcome. The average quality of the articles was fair to good. Most studies were cross-sectional in design; many failed to address adequately confounding and the use of multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Low literacy is associated with several adverse health outcomes. Future research, using more rigorous methods, will better define these relationships and guide developers of new interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To review the relationship between literacy and health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS), Industrial and Labor Relations Review (ILLR), PsychInfo, and Ageline from 1980 to 2003. STUDY SELECTION: We included observational studies that reported original data, measured literacy with any valid instrument, and measured one or more health outcomes. Two abstractors reviewed each study for inclusion and resolved disagreements by discussion. DATA EXTRACTION: One reviewer abstracted data from each article into an evidence table; the second reviewer checked each entry. The whole study team reconciled disagreements about information in evidence tables. Both data extractors independently completed an 11-item quality scale for each article; scores were averaged to give a final measure of article quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: We reviewed 3,015 titles and abstracts and pulled 684 articles for full review; 73 articles met inclusion criteria and, of those, 44 addressed the questions of this report. Patients with low literacy had poorer health outcomes, including knowledge, intermediate disease markers, measures of morbidity, general health status, and use of health resources. Patients with low literacy were generally 1.5 to 3 times more likely to experience a given poor outcome. The average quality of the articles was fair to good. Most studies were cross-sectional in design; many failed to address adequately confounding and the use of multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Low literacy is associated with several adverse health outcomes. Future research, using more rigorous methods, will better define these relationships and guide developers of new interventions.
Authors: Loren G Miller; Honghu Liu; Ron D Hays; Carol E Golin; Zhishen Ye; C Keith Beck; Andrew H Kaplan; Neil S Wenger Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2003-01-30 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: David W Baker; Julie A Gazmararian; Mark V Williams; Tracy Scott; Ruth M Parker; Diane Green; Junling Ren; Jennifer Peel Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Carol E Golin; Honghu Liu; Ron D Hays; Loren G Miller; C Keith Beck; Jeanette Ickovics; Andrew H Kaplan; Neil S Wenger Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: C Battersby; K Hartley; A E Fletcher; H J Markowe; R G Brown; W Styles; S Carne; T Jamieson; I Koppel; S Fraser Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Stacy C Bailey; Rachel O'Conor; Elizabeth A Bojarski; Rebecca Mullen; Rachel E Patzer; Daniel Vicencio; Kara L Jacobson; Ruth M Parker; Michael S Wolf Journal: Health Expect Date: 2014-11-02 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Diana W Stewart; Lorraine R Reitzel; Virmarie Correa-Fernández; Miguel Ángel Cano; Claire E Adams; Yumei Cao; Yisheng Li; Andrew J Waters; David W Wetter; Jennifer Irvin Vidrine Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2014-04-08
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Terry A Jacobson; Ileko C Mugalla; Courtney R Cawthon; Kurt J Niesner; Viola Vaccarino Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Katie Kiser; Daniel Jonas; Zachary Warner; Kelli Scanlon; Betsy Bryant Shilliday; Darren A DeWalt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joule J Li; Sarah L Appleton; Gary A Wittert; Andrew Vakulin; R Douglas McEvoy; Nick A Antic; Robert J Adams Journal: Sleep Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 5.849