Literature DB >> 10912984

Evaluation of the readability of ACOG patient education pamphlets. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

M C Freda1, K Damus, I R Merkatz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether ACOG's patient education pamphlets comply with the recommended readability level for health education materials intended for the general public.
METHODS: All 100 English-language pamphlets available during 1997 (created or revised between 1988 and 1997) were evaluated using four standard readability formulas.
RESULTS: Mean readability levels of ACOG's pamphlets were between grade 7.0 to grade 9.3, depending on the formula used. Analysis of readability over the 10 years showed a trend toward lower readability levels. Analysis by category of pamphlet found that the lowest readability levels were in "Especially for teens" pamphlets.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that most of ACOG's patient education pamphlets currently available are written at a higher readability level than recommended for the general public. The readability of those pamphlets improved in the 10 years since the organization published its first pamphlet, but the goal of sixth-grade readability level has not been reached.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10912984     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00518-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  The impact of an educational pamphlet on knowledge and anxiety in women with preeclampsia.

Authors:  Nadine Sauvé; Raymond O Powrie; Lucia Larson; Maureen G Phipps; Sherry Weitzen; Donna Fitzpatrick; Karen Rosene-Montella
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2008-09-01

2.  A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.

Authors:  Alexandra Martin; J Ryan Stewart; Jeremy Gaskins; Erin Medlin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Readability estimates for commonly used health-related quality of life surveys.

Authors:  Sylvia H Paz; Honghu Liu; Marie N Fongwa; Leo S Morales; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Quality and readability of information materials for people with brain tumours and their families.

Authors:  Danette Langbecker; Monika Janda
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  The Journey to Become a Health Literate Organization: A Snapshot of Health System Improvement.

Authors:  Cindy Brach
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2017

6.  Facilitating behavior change with low-literacy patient education materials.

Authors:  Hilary K Seligman; Andrea S Wallace; Darren A DeWalt; Dean Schillinger; Connie L Arnold; Betsy Bryant Shilliday; Adriana Delgadillo; Nikki Bengal; Terry C Davis
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

7.  Health Literacy and Associated Outcomes in the Postpartum Period at Grady Memorial Hospital.

Authors:  Jade D Stafford; Emily R Goggins; Eva Lathrop; Lisa B Haddad
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-11-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.