Literature DB >> 12088606

Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices.

Charlotte E Rees1, Jillyan E Ford, Charlotte E Sheard.   

Abstract

Patients require good quality, evidence based information so that they can participate actively in the decision making process. The DISCERN instrument has been developed to help patients rate the quality of written information materials about treatment choices. This study evaluated the reliability of DISCERN using 31 information leaflets discussing treatment options for prostate cancer. The index of agreement between two independent raters was substantial for the overall quality rating (kappa=0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.49, 0.82), indicating that the instrument could be used to discriminate reliably between low and high quality prostate cancer publications. Healthcare professionals should inform patients of the availability of the instrument and encourage its use by patients who regularly attend to written sources of information on treatment choices. Early indications show that DISCERN could enable both patients and healthcare professionals to discriminate between the plethora of variable quality information currently available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12088606     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00225-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  31 in total

1.  Quality of drug information on the World Wide Web and strategies to improve pages with poor information quality. An intervention study on pages about sildenafil.

Authors:  Meret Martin-Facklam; Michael Kostrzewa; Peter Martin; Walter E Haefeli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Evaluation of dengue-related health information on the internet.

Authors:  Navya R Rao; Manaswini Mohapatra; Swayamprabha Mishra; Ashish Joshi
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-04-01

3.  Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish.

Authors:  M Bea-Muñoz; M Medina-Sánchez; M T Flórez-García
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  The Role of Health Literacy in Predicting Multiple Healthcare Outcomes Among Hispanics in a Nationally Representative Sample: A Comparative Analysis by English Proficiency Levels.

Authors:  Madhurima Sarkar; Lindsey Asti; Kristine M Nacion; Deena J Chisolm
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2016-06

5.  An evaluation of the completeness of drug-drug interaction-related information in package inserts.

Authors:  Giok Qin Ng; Grant Edward Sklar; Hui Ting Chng
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  The quality of snoring treatment information on the internet.

Authors:  Vik Veer; Glen Alder; Umesh Ullal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Ensuring quality information for patients: development and preliminary validation of a new instrument to improve the quality of written health care information.

Authors:  Beki Moult; Linda S Franck; Helen Brady
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Reliability, Readability and Quality of Online Information about Femoracetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Fatih Küçükdurmaz; Miguel M Gomez; Eric Secrist; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-07

9.  Quality and readability of information materials for people with brain tumours and their families.

Authors:  Danette Langbecker; Monika Janda
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 10.  A systematic review of the quality of information on the treatment of anxiety disorders on the internet.

Authors:  Jonathan C Ipser; Sarah Dewing; Dan J Stein
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.