Literature DB >> 20875848

Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.

Dennis McFadden1, Michelle D Hsieh, Adrian Garcia-Sierra, Craig A Champlin.   

Abstract

Auditory evoked potential (AEP) data from two studies originally designed for other purposes were reanalyzed. The auditory brainstem response (ABR), middle-latency response (MLR), and long-latency response (LLR) were measured. The latencies to each of several peaks were measured for each subject for each ear of click presentation, and the time intervals between successive peaks were calculated. Of interest were differences in interpeak intervals between the sexes, between people of differing sexual orientations, and between the two ears of stimulation. Most of the differences obtained were small. The largest sex differences were for interval I → V in the ABR and interval N1 → N2 of the LLR (effect sizes > 0.6). The largest differences between heterosexuals and nonheterosexuals were for the latency to Wave I in both sexes, for the interval Na → Nb in females, and for intervals V → Na and Nb → N1 in males (effect sizes > 0.3). The largest difference for ear stimulated was for interval N1 → N2 in heterosexual females (effect size ∼0.5). No substantial differences were found in the AEP intervals between women using, and not using, oral contraceptives. Left/right correlations for the interpeak intervals were mostly between about 0.4 and 0.6. Correlations between the ipsilateral intervals were small; i.e., interval length early in the AEP series was not highly predictive of interval length later in the series. Interpeak intervals appear generally less informative than raw latencies about differences by sex and by sexual orientation.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20875848      PMCID: PMC2997906          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  40 in total

1.  Basic properties of the sound-evoked post-auricular muscle response (PAMR).

Authors:  G A O'Beirne; R B Patuzzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Estrogen influences auditory brainstem responses during the normal menstrual cycle.

Authors:  K E Elkind-Hirsch; W R Stoner; B A Stach; J F Jerger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The effects of cochlear hearing loss, age and sex on the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  D R Watson
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

5.  Relationship between head size and latency of the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  J J Dempsey; E Censoprano; M Mazor
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1986

6.  Gender differences in cochlear response time: an explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; A Masuda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sex hormones regulate ABR latency.

Authors:  K E Elkind-Hirsch; E Wallace; L R Malinak; J J Jerger
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  A functional measure of brain activity: brain stem transmission time.

Authors:  M Fabiani; H Sohmer; C Tait; M Gafni; R Kinarti
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-10

9.  Auditory brainstem responses after ovariectomy and estrogen replacement in rat.

Authors:  J R Coleman; D Campbell; W A Cooper; M G Welsh; J Moyer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Gender distinctions and lateral asymmetry in the low-level auditory brainstem response of the human neonate.

Authors:  Y S Sininger; B Cone-Wesson; C Abdala
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

3.  Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds.

Authors:  Mohd Normani Zakaria; Bahram Jalaei; Nor Alaudin Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and a proxy measure of cochlear length derived from the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Otoacoustic emissions, auditory evoked potentials and self-reported gender in people affected by disorders of sex development (DSD).

Authors:  Amy B Wisniewski; Blas Espinoza-Varas; Christopher E Aston; Shelagh Edmundson; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 6.  Estrogenic modulation of auditory processing: a vertebrate comparison.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.606

7.  Auditory evoked potentials: Differences by sex, race, and menstrual cycle and correlations with common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Craig A Champlin; Michelle H Pho; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ipsilateral and contralateral auditory brainstem response reorganization in hemispherectomized patients.

Authors:  Ning Yao; Hui Qiao; Ping Li; Yang Liu; Liang Wu; Xiaofeng Deng; Zide Wang; Daxing Chen; Xianzeng Tong; Yuan Liu; Chenlong Yang; Yulun Xu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Sex differences in noise-induced hearing loss: a cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Qixuan Wang; Xueling Wang; Lu Yang; Kun Han; Zhiwu Huang; Hao Wu
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 5.027

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.