Literature DB >> 21310172

Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Dennis McFadden1.   

Abstract

The auditory system exhibits differences by sex and by sexual orientation, and the implication is that relevant auditory structures are altered during prenatal development, possibly by exposure to androgens. The otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) of newborn male infants are weaker than those of newborn females, and these sex differences persist through the lifespan. The OAEs of nonheterosexual females also are weaker than those of heterosexual females, suggesting an atypically strong exposure to androgens some time early in development. Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) also exhibit sex differences beginning early in life. Some AEPs are different for heterosexual and nonheterosexual females, and other AEPs are different for heterosexual and nonheterosexual males. Research on non-humans treated with androgenic or anti-androgenic agents also suggests that OAEs are masculinized by prenatal exposure to androgens late in gestation. Collectively, the evidence suggests that prenatal androgens, acting globally or locally, affect both nonheterosexuality and the auditory system.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21310172      PMCID: PMC3085661          DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol        ISSN: 0091-3022            Impact factor:   8.606


  77 in total

1.  Sex and ethnic differences in 2nd to 4th digit ratio of children.

Authors:  J T Manning; A Stewart; P E Bundred; R L Trivers
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Michelle D Hsieh; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Craig A Champlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Additional findings on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear mechanisms: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D McFadden; J C Loehlin; E G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Longitudinal measurements of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in infants.

Authors:  E M Burns; S L Campbell; K H Arehart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Development of cochlear active mechanisms in humans differs between gender.

Authors:  T Morlet; E Perrin; J D Durrant; A Lapillonne; C Ferber; R Duclaux; G Putet; L Collet
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Differential effects of perinatal androgen treatment on sexually dimorphic characteristics in rats.

Authors:  B D Sachs; D A Thomas
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1985-05

9.  Incidence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children and infants.

Authors:  E A Strickland; E M Burns; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  What does the "four core genotypes" mouse model tell us about sex differences in the brain and other tissues?

Authors:  Arthur P Arnold; Xuqi Chen
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 8.606

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Human Sexual Orientation: The Importance of Evidentiary Convergence.

Authors:  Jacques Balthazart; Lucas Court
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2017-05-12

3.  Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Minireview: Hormones and human sexual orientation.

Authors:  Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and a proxy measure of cochlear length derived from the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Neurobiology of gender identity and sexual orientation.

Authors:  C E Roselli
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.627

Review 8.  Estrogenic modulation of auditory processing: a vertebrate comparison.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.606

9.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Functional Development of the Cochlear Amplifier in Humans.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Samantha Zambrano; Hansapani Rodrigo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Sex Genotyping of Archival Fixed and Immunolabeled Guinea Pig Cochleas.

Authors:  Frédéric F Depreux; Lyubov Czech; Donna S Whitlon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.