Literature DB >> 20968363

Overshoot using very short signal delays.

Dennis McFadden1, Kyle P Walsh, Edward G Pasanen, Erin M Grenwelge.   

Abstract

The detectability of a 10-ms tone masked by a 400-ms wideband noise was measured as a function of the delay in the onset of the tone compared to the onset of the noise burst. Unlike most studies like this on auditory overshoot, special attention was given to signal delays between 0 and 45 ms. Nine well-practiced subjects were tested using an adaptive psychophysical procedure in which the level of the masking noise was adjusted to estimate 79% correct detections. Tones of both 3.0 and 4.0 kHz, at different levels, were used as signals. For the subjects showing overshoot, detectability remained approximately constant for at least 20-30 ms of signal delay, and then detectability began to improve gradually toward its maximum at about 150-200 ms. That is, there was a "hesitation" prior to detectability beginning to improve, and the duration of this hesitation was similar to that seen in physiological measurements of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) system. This result provides further support for the hypothesis that the MOC efferent system makes a major contribution to overshoot in simultaneous masking.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20968363      PMCID: PMC2981109          DOI: 10.1121/1.3480568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

1.  Effect of masker level on overshoot.

Authors:  S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of masker spectral asymmetry on overshoot in simultaneous masking.

Authors:  S Schmidt; E Zwicker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral, intensive, and temporal factors influencing overshoot.

Authors:  S P Bacon; M A Smith
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

4.  Detectability of simultaneously masked signals as a function of signal bandwidth for different signal delays.

Authors:  B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Correlated individual differences in conditions used to measure psychophysical suppression and signal enhancement.

Authors:  B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detectability of simultaneously masked signals as a function of masker bandwidth and configuration for different signal delays.

Authors:  B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Reductions in overshoot following intense sound exposures.

Authors:  C A Champlin; D McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of masker level on overshoot in running- and frozen-noise maskers.

Authors:  R von Klitzing; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effect of level and relative frequency region on the recovery of overshoot.

Authors:  G J Overson; S P Bacon; T M Webb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.

Authors:  T Kawase; B Delgutte; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Alix M Klang; Nathan T Torunsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28

3.  Temporal Effects on Monaural Amplitude-Modulation Sensitivity in Ipsilateral, Contralateral and Bilateral Noise.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Luis E López-Bascuas; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-05

4.  Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.

Authors:  Francesca Rocchi; Margit E Dylla; Peter A Bohlen; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Efferent modulation of hair cell function.

Authors:  Richard D Rabbitt; William E Brownell
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 8.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

9.  Brainstem Representation of Auditory Overshoot in Guinea Pigs Using Auditory Brainstem Responses.

Authors:  Hassan Haddadzade Niri; Akram Pourbakht; Nariman Rahbar; Hamid Haghani
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 10.  Olivocochlear Efferents in Animals and Humans: From Anatomy to Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.